Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
What Works Clearinghouse | 2 |
Coalition for Evidence-Based… | 1 |
Evaluation Practice | 1 |
New Directions for Evaluation | 1 |
Author
Fillos, Rita M. | 1 |
Lincoln, Yvonna Seossions | 1 |
Manger, Katherine M. | 1 |
Peersman, Greet | 1 |
Rugg, Deborah | 1 |
Sherwood-Fabre, Liese | 1 |
Tisne, Suzanne | 1 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Policymakers | 2 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
What Works Clearinghouse, 2017
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evaluates research studies that look at the effectiveness of education programs, products, practices, and policies, which the WWC calls "interventions." Many studies of education interventions make claims about impacts on students' outcomes. Some studies have designs that enable readers to make causal…
Descriptors: Program Design, Program Development, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Fillos, Rita M.; Manger, Katherine M. – 1984
Brief case studies of three projects are presented to illustrate the steps which open "Wonderful Programs" to evaluation research. The evaluator is provided with the perspective needed to believe the evaluation is worth doing. The project staff is then redirected to the need for a new type of evidence. An ongoing review of the commitment…
Descriptors: Communication Problems, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluators
Sherwood-Fabre, Liese – 1986
This paper examines the concepts of program monitoring and program evaluation in the literature, and offers working definitions based on two dimensions of measurement: focus (what questions are addressed) and timing (how often the measures are taken). Focus can be on inputs to the program or outcomes from it; timing can be one-shot or continuous.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Formative Evaluation, Program Administration

Lincoln, Yvonna Seossions – Evaluation Practice, 1991
The various arts and sciences that comprise the field of program evaluation are discussed. It is argued that emphasis on rigor and expressive content has left other aspects of evaluation unexplored. Educational evaluators need to consider what programs mean and how they contribute to understanding. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
What Works Clearinghouse, 2005
The purpose of this guide is to provide clear, practical advice on reporting the results of an evaluation of an educational program or practice ("intervention"). Specifically, this is a guide for researchers, and those who sponsor and use research, to reporting the results of "impact" studies--that is, studies that evaluate the…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Intervention, Research Reports
Peersman, Greet; Rugg, Deborah – New Directions for Evaluation, 2004
Although a necessary component of good program management and accountability, monitoring data do not usually provide answers to questions about whether, how, and why a specific program works. More in-depth, systematic inquiry is needed to do this. In this article, the authors focus on the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-prevention…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Pilot Projects, Prevention
Tisne, Suzanne – 1985
The general decline in public resources has encouraged government agencies to consolidate job functions, and the internal program evaluator is becoming a scarce commodity. This paper briefly describes a case study about the circumstances and implications of merging two formally antagonistic job roles: program administrator and program evaluator.…
Descriptors: Adults, Case Studies, Community Programs, Delinquency
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, 2005
The purpose of this Guide is to provide Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) project officials and evaluators with clear, practical advice on how to conduct rigorous evaluations of MSP projects at low cost. Specifically, this is a how-to Guide designed to enable MSP grantees and evaluators of MSP projects to answer questions about the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Science Achievement, Program Effectiveness, Science Teachers