Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Attali, Yigal | 1 |
Bakker, J. | 1 |
Beek, F. J. A. | 1 |
Haaring, C. | 1 |
Kruitwagen, C. L. J. J. | 1 |
Muijtjens, A. M. M. | 1 |
Ravesloot, C. J. | 1 |
Ten Cate, Th. J. | 1 |
Van Schaik, J.P.J. | 1 |
Van der Schaaf, M. F. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ravesloot, C. J.; Van der Schaaf, M. F.; Muijtjens, A. M. M.; Haaring, C.; Kruitwagen, C. L. J. J.; Beek, F. J. A.; Bakker, J.; Van Schaik, J.P.J.; Ten Cate, Th. J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2015
Formula scoring (FS) is the use of a don't know option (DKO) with subtraction of points for wrong answers. Its effect on construct validity and reliability of progress test scores, is subject of discussion. Choosing a DKO may not only be affected by knowledge level, but also by risk taking tendency, and may thus introduce construct-irrelevant…
Descriptors: Scoring Formulas, Tests, Scores, Construct Validity
Attali, Yigal – ETS Research Report Series, 2007
Because there is no commonly accepted view of what makes for good writing, automated essay scoring (AES) ideally should be able to accommodate different theoretical positions, certainly at the level of state standards but also perhaps among teachers at the classroom level. This paper presents a practical approach and an interactive computer…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Essay Tests, Scoring