NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20242
Since 2021 (last 5 years)12
Since 2016 (last 10 years)27
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Michelle Ann Epiphany Prosser – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Generation Z members are our future leaders. They are eventually going to run the world and are starting to make their unique characteristics known. Due to the current generational transitions, they will assume leadership roles earlier than previous generations, mainly owing to the increased migration of Baby Boomers out of the workforce.…
Descriptors: Leadership Training, Curriculum Design, Age Groups, Generational Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Berge, Zane L.; Garcia, Kristen M.; Graham, Michelle A. – Journal of Educational Technology, 2022
Given the array of generations in the workplace and the variety of learning theories and technological exposure across those generations, many instructional design professionals argue that training should be tailored to these differences. We were skeptical of this assertion and sought to explore evidence for improved effectiveness in tailoring…
Descriptors: Job Training, Generational Differences, Preferences, Teaching Methods
Jodi Day – ProQuest LLC, 2023
The current educational workforce is made up of baby boomers, Generation Xers, millennials, and Generation Zers. Research on generational theory reflects variations in characteristics, work preferences and values among generations, yet there is little known whether teachers from these various generations need differing leadership practices to…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Leadership Styles, Preferences, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Šabíková, Nikola; Valentová, Kamila; Masaryk, Radomír; Neusar, Aleš; Sokolová, Lenka – Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 2023
Students whose parents did not study at a university (first-generation students) exhibit differences in how they decide whether and what to study, compared to students whose parents attended university. In our study, we looked for possible similarities and differences between these two groups of students. The participants were Slovak students aged…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Foreign Countries, Student Characteristics, First Generation College Students
Sara McMillen – ProQuest LLC, 2024
This research explored the link between generational differences in preferred organizational culture and leadership styles within elementary and secondary schools. Using a cross-sectional survey of teachers in Pennsylvania, the study found no significant correlation between generational differences and organizational culture, however it revealed a…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Organizational Culture, Preferences, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Manurung, Elvy Maria; Purwadi, Yohanes Slamet; Sugiharto, Ignatius Bambang – Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2022
Digital culture has penetrated most aspects of our lives. Yet it has also dragged us into paradoxical situations and profound uncertainty. This, in turn, requires digital learning process that is capable of fostering mature individuals characterized by specific creativity; the kind of creativity rooted in prudence, deep insight into life as well…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Electronic Learning, Learning Processes, Creativity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Suin Roberts – Migration and Language Education, 2023
Korean Americans and Korean Germans exhibit similarities in their upbringing and migration processes: The first generation, speaking Korean natively and solid in their identity as Koreans, attempt to raise their children with a Korean identity in a culture, where English or German is the mainstream language. Given their minority status in either…
Descriptors: Self Concept, Language Usage, Food, Preferences
Sarah B. Rist – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Quantitative data was collected from 926 traditional-aged postsecondary students, of which most (69%) respondents were upperclassmen in their junior or senior year of college. The findings from this overall research indicate that there has been a shift in how today's Generation Z learners view online and hybrid learning and their ideal way to take…
Descriptors: Student Welfare, Educational Experience, Young Adults, Graduate Students
Keyanna Hawkins – ProQuest LLC, 2022
A qualitative descriptive key-case study focusing on the perceptions of women in leadership regarding organizational conflict with managers, subordinates, and peers was conducted. The study examined how women leaders deal with conflict in higher education settings. A dual concern theory (DCT) framework was employed to study women's perceptions of…
Descriptors: Leaders, Females, Higher Education, Conflict Resolution
Noorh Albadi – ProQuest LLC, 2020
The purpose of this study was to investigate the preferred learning styles among undergraduate interior design students of Generation Z. The Gregorc Style Delineator, a self-report instrument to determine learning style, was administered to 500 undergraduate interior design students enrolled in 14 Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA)…
Descriptors: Interior Design, Young Adults, Learning Modalities, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yastibas, Ahmet Erdost; Baturay, Meltem Huri; Ertas, Abdullah – Journal on School Educational Technology, 2021
The number of Generation Z English Language (EL) learners in institutions of higher education has been increasing, so it has become significant for EL teachers to understand the features and learning preferences of Generation Z EL learners to meet their needs and teach English to them effectively. This descriptive study which was conducted with…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Age Groups
Camillo, Denise M. – ProQuest LLC, 2019
The topic of study was communication technology preferences of online students and online instructors. The generational cohorts of each group were all assessed to see if preferential differences existed due to age. The research problem was that technical generational differences cause challenges with effective communication between faculty and…
Descriptors: Age Groups, Generational Differences, Computer Mediated Communication, Interpersonal Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brink, Kyle E.; Zondag, Marcel M. – Journal of Career Development, 2021
This study examines whether job attribute preferences differ across three generational cohorts (i.e., cohorts of undergraduate students from 1995, 2004, and 2013). In 2013, we surveyed undergraduate students from several U.S. universities. We also obtained archival results from surveys administered to undergraduate students in 1995 and 2004. We…
Descriptors: Preferences, Generational Differences, Job Applicants, Undergraduate Students
Popescu, Diana; Popa, Diana Mariana; Cotet, Beatrice Gabriela – Journal of Educational Psychology - Propositos y Representaciones, 2019
As there is a worldwide adoption of 3D printing (3DP) in many activity areas, formal education becomes mandatory for acquiring theoretical knowledge and hands-on skills for an efficient use, for bringing real contributions to the development of this technology and its applications. Truly digitally natives, Gen Z students are now entering higher…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Printing, Engineering Education, College Faculty
West, Cynthia Elaine – ProQuest LLC, 2017
The purpose of this mixed method study was to examine the instructional preferences of millennial learners and how their instructional preferences affect their choice in post-secondary business programs. The instructional preferences of millennial learners are an important question for post-secondary business programs enrolling learners from…
Descriptors: Generational Differences, Mixed Methods Research, Postsecondary Education, College Students
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2