NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Matthew P. Brancaleone; Laura C. Boucher; Jingzhen Yang; Daniel Merfeld; James A. Onate – Journal of American College Health, 2025
This study examined the difference in the dynamic visual acuity test (DVAT) between collegiate athletes who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (D/HoH) (n = 38) and university club-level athletes who are hearing (n = 38). Dynamic visual acuity was assessed using the Bertec Vision Advantage (Bertec® Corporation, Columbus, Ohio, USA). No statistically…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Student Athletes, Deafness, College Athletics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Adrienne Thorne; Karen Stagnitti; Judi Parson – American Journal of Play, 2024
The authors compare pretend play and executive function both in preschool children with an acquired brain injury and in neurotypical preschool children. They find the ability to produce logical, sequenced pretend play actions and object substitutions in play correlates strongly with executive function ability in both groups, and working memory…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Executive Function, Play, Brain
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amanda J. Aubel; Garen J. Wintemute; Aaron B. Shev; Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz – Health Education & Behavior, 2025
Optimism bias is common across health risk assessments, including firearm injury risk, and can have behavioral consequences. Using data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, we examine whether optimism bias influences firearm injury prevention practices and policy support by comparing the characteristics, behaviors, and opinions of…
Descriptors: Prevention, Injuries, Weapons, Safety
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lisa M. Jones; Anna Segura Montagut; Kimberly J. Mitchell; Heather A. Turner; Sherry Hamby; Carlos A. Cuevas – International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2024
While research knowledge of bias-based bullying is increasing, there has been only limited research comparing in-person and online bias-based victimization incidents. The current study presents data on 521 bias-based incidents experienced by a large sample of youth (n = 854), 13-21 years old, examining differences between incidents that occurred…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Bullying, Victims, Emotional Disturbances