Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Correlation | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Addition | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Arithmetic | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Alnajashi, Sumyah | 1 |
Christ, Theodore J. | 1 |
Gross, Paul R. | 1 |
Monaghen, Barbara D. | 1 |
Van Norman, Ethan R. | 1 |
Zopluoglu, Cengiz | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 12 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Alnajashi, Sumyah – Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2021
This study aims to examine the differences in numerosity estimation on a right-to-left number line between second- to fourth-grade students and undergraduate students, together with whether number-line estimation is related to basic arithmetic tasks (addition and subtraction). Hence, 53 Arabic-speaking children and 63 Arabic-speaking adults…
Descriptors: Computation, Grade 2, Grade 3, Grade 4
Christ, Theodore J.; Zopluoglu, Cengiz; Monaghen, Barbara D.; Van Norman, Ethan R. – Journal of School Psychology, 2013
Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading (CBM-R) is used to collect time series data, estimate the rate of student achievement, and evaluate program effectiveness. A series of 5 studies were carried out to evaluate the validity, reliability, precision, and diagnostic accuracy of progress monitoring across a variety of progress monitoring…
Descriptors: Reading Skills, Response to Intervention, Curriculum Based Assessment, Oral Reading
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction