Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Design | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Failure | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Mathematical Concepts | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Engineering… | 1 |
Author
| Chase, Catherine C. | 1 |
| Marks, Jenna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarks, Jenna; Chase, Catherine C. – Journal of Engineering Education, 2019
Background: Design thinking, with its emphasis on iterative prototyping and mantra of "fail early and often," stands in stark contrast to the typical one-and-done, failure-averse culture of the classroom. Iterative prototyping and fail-forward mindsets could promote valuable iterative practices and positive reactions to failure, but…
Descriptors: Intervention, Middle School Students, Design, Thinking Skills
