NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)14
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 184 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carman, Joanne G. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In "The Case for Participatory Evaluation in an Era of Accountability" (this issue), Jill Chouinard highlights seven tensions between the participatory and technocratic approaches to evaluation. She suggests that there is a need to create opportunities for more participatory approaches to evaluation. In this essay, I suggest that the era of…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evidence, Evaluation Methods, Research Opportunities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verger, Antoni; Sayed, Yusuf; Hiroshi, Ito; Croso, Camilla; Beardmore, Sarah – Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2012
The year 2015 is the deadline for most of the Education for All (EFA) goals. As this date gets closer, reviews about what has been done and reflection about future agendas will multiply. This Forum aims to contribute such a pressing debate, bringing together contributors from key international organisations within the EFA movement. They are…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Teaching Conditions, Public Education, Access to Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wilkens, Christian P. – Journal of School Choice, 2013
In this scholarly commentary, the author examines the major reasons U.S. charter schools have closed since 1992. The commentary provides examples of charter school failures in high-frequency areas, such as financial and organizational mismanagement, and academic underperformance; it further identifies two subcategories of academic risk:…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, School Administration, Failure, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Munley, Mary Ellen – Journal of Museum Education, 2010
Striving to provide public good and maximize public value strike many as highly abstract and idealistic ideas. Written in the form of an interview, this article, written from the perspective of a practitioner, addresses some of the pragmatic issues that arise when trying to conceptualize approaches to museum offerings and demonstrate their…
Descriptors: Museums, Public Opinion, World History, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gray, Denis O. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The rise of the research center has changed the landscape of U.S. research enter-prise. It has also created a number of evaluation challenges, particularly when considering strategically focused, multifaceted cooperative research centers (CRCs). The author argues that although recent CRC evaluation efforts have gone a long way toward meeting the…
Descriptors: Research and Development Centers, Program Evaluation, Accountability, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
This excerpt from the opening plenary asks evaluators to consider two questions regarding learning and evaluation: (a) How do evaluators know if, how, when, and what people are learning during an evaluation? and (b) In what ways can evaluation be a learning experience? To answer the first question, evaluators can apply the commonplaces of…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Learning Experience, Program Development
Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Hentges, Christina M.; Petrilli, Michael J.; Winkler, Amber M. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
Critics of school voucher programs argue that private schools that receive taxpayer dollars should be held accountable to the same standards as public schools. School choice supporters counter that private schools should be left alone to answer to the parents of their students. The authors advocate for a re-visit to the discussion of…
Descriptors: Educational Vouchers, Private Schools, Accountability, Disclosure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller, Robin Lin; King, Jean; Mark, Melvin – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Over the past 6 years, the Oral History Project Team has conducted interviews with individuals who have influenced the theory and practice of evaluation. In 2006, Robin Miller, with the help of Christian Coryn of The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University (WMU), and Daniela Schroeter, also at the Center, sat down with widely regarded…
Descriptors: Oral History, Program Evaluation, Personnel Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach
Hess, Frederick M.; Finn, Chester E., Jr. – American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2007
After five years of experience with the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and with reauthorization looming, it is time to draw some conclusions about how the act has actually unfolded--and how it ought to be changed. A new book from the AEI Press by Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr., "No Remedy Left Behind: Lessons from A Half-Decade…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Accountability, Policy Analysis, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forest, Laverne; Rossing, Boyd E. – Journal of Extension, 1982
Extension programs are traditionally human, personal, and responsive in character. The challenge is to design, implement, and evaluate programs that maintain their humanistic qualities while meeting increased accountability demands. (SK)
Descriptors: Accountability, Extension Education, Humanization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dedmond, Rebecca M. – Journal of Career Development, 1996
Outlines the criteria and necessary documentation in the Planning for Life program that are used to assess attainment of the seven Cs: clarity, commitment, comprehensiveness, collaboration, coherence, coordination, and competence. (SK)
Descriptors: Accountability, Career Planning, Documentation, Program Evaluation
Weir, Eric – 1980
Three types of explanation in evaluation are discussed: causal explanations, explanations of actions, and explanations of value judgments. The role and importance of each form is addressed, as are alternate approaches to providing such explanation. The concept of explanation is defined as anything said or done to help someone understand something.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, Evaluators
Comerford, Ralph; Silverman, Wade H. – 1988
Where mental health administrators used to rely on subjective judgments of senior clinicians to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health services, they now rely more on a quality assurance (QA) plan. The primary motive for undertaking a QA program should be better service. QA may start out being very expensive in terms of personnel and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administration, Administrators, Health Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Speiglman, Richard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1984
Two examples from the law enforcement field are presented in support of Ginsberg's (TM 508 964) view that social dysfunctionality follows from the attempt to distribute scarce resources in a manner that appears politically legitimate. (BW)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Utilization, Law Enforcement, Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hilgers, Thomas – College English, 1979
Discusses developments in program evaluation, suggests ways these may be used to develop the English curriculum, and suggests ways to improve evaluation. (DD)
Descriptors: Accountability, English Curriculum, English Instruction, Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13