NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive20
Journal Articles15
Speeches/Meeting Papers2
Books1
Opinion Papers1
Audience
Researchers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Government Performance and…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ciji A. Heiser; Julene L. Jones; Glenn Allen Phillips – Assessment Update, 2024
Institutions of higher education are asked to consider how their work can advance equity in institutional outcomes. Assessment, too, has been asked to consider the ways in which traditional student assessment "privileges and validates certain types of learning and evidence of learning over others" (Montenegro and Jankowski 2017, p. 5).…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Equal Education, Educational Assessment, Professional Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Smith, Kristen L.; Finney, Sara J.; Fulcher, Keston H. – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2017
Implementation fidelity data indicate to what extent the delivered educational intervention (e.g., pedagogies, curricula) differs from the designed intervention (Gerstner & Finney, 2013; O'Donnell, 2008). Fidelity data help practitioners make more accurate inferences regarding program effectiveness (Dumas, Lynch, Laughlin, Smith, & Prinz,…
Descriptors: Fidelity, Program Implementation, Intervention, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Malloy, Courtney L.; Lee, Janet S.; Cawthon, Stephanie W. – Odyssey: New Directions in Deaf Education, 2016
In today's world, much of what used to be individual work has become collaborative. Moreover, complex change initiatives often require individuals within and across organizations to team up to set and achieve meaningful goals. The role of researchers and evaluators is to offer support that can be used to strengthen the work of organizations and…
Descriptors: Deafness, Hearing Impairments, Evaluative Thinking, Abstract Reasoning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
O'Sullivan, Rita G. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2012
Collaborative Evaluation systematically invites and engages stakeholders in program evaluation planning and implementation. Unlike "distanced" evaluation approaches, which reject stakeholder participation as evaluation team members, Collaborative Evaluation assumes that active, on-going engagement between evaluators and program staff,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Penuel, William R.; Means, Barbara – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Major advances in the number, capabilities, and quality of state, national, and transnational databases have opened up new opportunities for evaluators. Both large-scale data sets collected for administrative purposes and those collected by other researchers can provide data for a variety of evaluation-related activities. These include (a)…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Analysis, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Orsini, Muhsin Michael; Wyrick, David L.; Milroy, Jeffrey J. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2012
Blending high-quality and rigorous research with pure evaluation practice can often be best accomplished through thoughtful collaboration. The evaluation of a high school drug prevention program (All Stars Senior) is an example of how perceived competing purposes and methodologies can coexist to investigate formative and summative outcome…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Prevention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carlsson, Gunilla; Haak, Maria; Nygren, Carita; Iwarsson, Susanne – International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2012
The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between self-reported and professionally assessed functional limitations in community-dwelling very old individuals. In total, 306 single-living adults aged 81-90 years were included in this cross-sectional study. The main outcome measure was the presence and absence of self-reported and…
Descriptors: Depression (Psychology), Housing, Correlation, Older Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Williams, Andrew P.; Morris, John C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
The use of theory-driven evaluation is an emerging practice in the military--an aspect generally unknown in the civilian evaluation community. First developed during the 1991 Gulf War and applied in both the Balkans and Afghanistan, these techniques are now being examined in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) as a means to evaluate the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xenos, Michalis; Papadopoulos, Thanos – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2007
This article presents a method for computer-aided tutor evaluation: Bayesian Networks are used for organizing the collected data about tutors and for enabling accurate estimations and predictions about future tutor behavior. The model provides indications about each tutor's strengths and weaknesses, which enables the evaluator to exploit strengths…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Tutors, Open Universities, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cooksy, Leslie J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
All evaluators face the challenge of striving to adhere to the highest possible standards of ethical conduct. Translating the AEA's Guiding Principles and the Joint Committee's Program Evaluation Standards into everyday practice, however, can be a complex, uncertain, and frustrating endeavor. Moreover, acting in an ethical fashion can require…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluators, Ethics, Evaluation Methods
Schubert, Jane G. – 1982
Studies were conducted by the American Institute for Research (AIR) under contract with the Department of Education (ED). An evaluability assessment determines the extent to which a program is ready for evaluation, the changes needed to make the program more manageable and accountable, and toward what questions a more extensive evaluation might…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluators
Costa, Crist H. – 1985
Evaluators, by the nature of their work, must be concerned with data management activities ranging from the collection and recording of data to the analyses, summation, and presentation of those data. Though word processing has been cited as the most frequently used microcomputer package by educational evaluators, spreadsheets are among the most…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Documentation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mark, Melvin M.; Eyssell, Kristen M.; Campbell, Bernadette – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Focuses on ethical issues that can arise in the collection and analysis of data in evaluations. Addresses four issues: (1) the application of cost-benefit thinking to judgments about research ethics, (2) the quality of research design, (3) the need to explore the data, and (4) the censoring of data. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scheirer, Mary Ann – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Program theory and implementation process theory contribute, respectively, to specifying the what and the why of program delivery. This article discusses the relationship between these two theories and the types of data collection methods that can be derived from each in order to contribute to more comprehensive evaluation designs. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bamberger, Michael; Rugh, Jim; Church, Mary; Fort, Lucia – American Journal of Evaluation, 2004
The paper discusses two common scenarios in which evaluators must conduct impact evaluations when working under budget, time, or data constraints. Under the first scenario the evaluator is not called in until the project is already well advanced, and there is a tight deadline for completing the evaluation, frequently combined with a limited budget…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Effectiveness, Evaluators, Control Groups
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2