NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Reilly, Erin Dawna; Stafford, Rose Eleanore; Williams, Kyle Marie; Corliss, Stephanie Brooks – International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2014
The use of massive open online courses (MOOCs) to expand students' access to higher education has raised questions regarding the extent to which this course model can provide and assess authentic, higher level student learning. In response to this need, MOOC platforms have begun utilizing automated essay scoring (AES) systems that allow…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Essays, Scoring, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Attali, Yigal; Lewis, Will; Steier, Michael – Language Testing, 2013
Automated essay scoring can produce reliable scores that are highly correlated with human scores, but is limited in its evaluation of content and other higher-order aspects of writing. The increased use of automated essay scoring in high-stakes testing underscores the need for human scoring that is focused on higher-order aspects of writing. This…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essay Tests, Reliability, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stadnytska, Tetiana; Braun, Simone; Werner, Joachim – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2008
This article evaluates the Smallest Canonical Correlation Method (SCAN) and the Extended Sample Autocorrelation Function (ESACF), automated methods for the Autoregressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA) model selection commonly available in current versions of SAS for Windows, as identification tools for integrated processes. SCAN and ESACF can…
Descriptors: Models, Identification, Multivariate Analysis, Correlation
Kaplan, Randy M.; Bennett, Randy Elliot – 1994
This study explores the potential for using a computer-based scoring procedure for the formulating-hypotheses (F-H) item. This item type presents a situation and asks the examinee to generate explanations for it. Each explanation is judged right or wrong, and the number of creditable explanations is summed to produce an item score. Scores were…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Correlation, Higher Education