Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Applied Psychological… | 7 |
Author
Forsyth, Robert A. | 2 |
Levin, Joel R. | 2 |
Subkoviak, Michael J. | 2 |
Berger, Martjin P. F. | 1 |
Hanson, Bradley A. | 1 |
Manalo, Jonathan R. | 1 |
Rijmen, Frank | 1 |
von Davier, Alina A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rijmen, Frank; Manalo, Jonathan R.; von Davier, Alina A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2009
This article describes two methods for obtaining the standard errors of two commonly used population invariance measures of equating functions: the root mean square difference of the subpopulation equating functions from the overall equating function and the root expected mean square difference. The delta method relies on an analytical…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Sampling, Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis

Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note shows that, under conditions specified by Levin and Subkoviak (TM 503 420), it is not necessary to specify the reliabilities of observed scores when comparing completely randomized designs with randomized block designs. Certain errors in their illustrative example are also discussed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability

Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Comments (TM 503 706) on an earlier article (TM 503 420) concerning the comparison of the completely randomized design and the randomized block design are acknowledged and appreciated. In addition, potentially misleading notions arising from these comments are addressed and clarified. (See also TM 503 708). (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability

Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note continues the discussion of earlier articles (TM 503 420, TM 503 706, and TM 503 707), comparing the completely randomized design with the randomized block design. (CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability

Hanson, Bradley A.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
The delta method was used to derive standard errors (SES) of the Levine observed score and Levine true score linear test equating methods using data from two test forms. SES derived without the normality assumption and bootstrap SES were very close. The situation with skewed score distributions is also discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement, Sampling

Berger, Martjin P. F. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
A generalized variance criterion is proposed to measure efficiency in item-response-theory (IRT) models. Heuristic arguments are given to formulate the efficiency of a design in terms of an asymptotic generalized variance criterion. Efficiencies of designs for one-, two-, and three-parameter models are compared. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Efficiency, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement

Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
Textbook calculations of statistical power or sample size follow from formulas that assume that the variables under consideration are measured without error. However, in the real world of behavioral research, errors of measurement cannot be neglected. The determination of sample size is discussed, and an example illustrates blocking strategy.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing