Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Assessment for Effective… | 3 |
Author
Cook, Clayton R. | 1 |
Crowley, Susan L. | 1 |
Feeney-Kettler, Kelly A. | 1 |
Hemmeter, Mary Louise | 1 |
Kaiser, Ann P. | 1 |
Kettler, Ryan J. | 1 |
Kratochwill, Thomas R. | 1 |
Livanis, Andrew | 1 |
Merrell, Kenneth W. | 1 |
Volpe, Robert J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cook, Clayton R.; Volpe, Robert J.; Livanis, Andrew – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2010
The majority of the literature on universal screening in education is devoted to academic screeners. However, research clearly indicates that other aspects of student functioning are closely associated with outcomes inside and outside of school. As a result, there are gaps in the current literature that call for additional research extending…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, At Risk Students, Student Evaluation, Measurement
Feeney-Kettler, Kelly A.; Kratochwill, Thomas R.; Kaiser, Ann P.; Hemmeter, Mary Louise; Kettler, Ryan J. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2010
Accurate identification of young children at risk for mental health problems is a key step in establishing early childhood preventive intervention programs. Without psychometrically valid identification procedures, children in need of early intervention may not be identified and may not receive appropriate care. This article provides a review of…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, School Psychologists, Mental Health Workers, Psychological Testing

Crowley, Susan L.; Merrell, Kenneth W. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2003
After identification of an alternative model of the School Social Behavior Scales, the invariance of the new model was tested with half of the original standardization sample (n=2,047). Both scales performed well and resulted in models very similar to those originally proposed by the author of the instrument. (Contains references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Antisocial Behavior, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Disability Identification