Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 6 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Computer Assisted Language… | 7 |
Author
Buckingham Shum, Simon | 1 |
Conijn, Rianne | 1 |
Feng, Ruiling | 1 |
Guo, Qian | 1 |
Hua, Yuanfang | 1 |
Knight, Simon | 1 |
Link, Stephanie | 1 |
Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto | 1 |
Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh | 1 |
Rahimi, Mohammad | 1 |
Saadet Korucu-Kis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Taichi Yamashita – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
The present paper reports on the effectiveness and inclusiveness of human-delivered synchronous written corrective feedback (SWCF) in paired writing tasks. Replicating Yamashita, Study 2 and Study 3 each conducted a classroom-based quasi-experimental study in an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing program at an American university. In Study…
Descriptors: Synchronous Communication, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Written Language
Link, Stephanie; Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in the use of automated writing evaluation (AWE) in second language writing classrooms. This increase is partially due to the belief that AWE can assist teachers by allowing them to devote more feedback to higher-level (HL) writing skills, such as content and organization, while the technology…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition)
Saadet Korucu-Kis – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2025
Although a number of studies examined the use of social networking sites (SNSs) in academic writing instruction, these studies mainly revolve around social media centered on microblogging features. Despite living in a visually dominated world, the potential of visual social media such as Instagram whereby the textual, the visual and the social can…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Visual Aids, Social Media
Conijn, Rianne; Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto; Knight, Simon; Buckingham Shum, Simon; Van Waes, Luuk; van Zaanen, Menno – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Current writing support tools tend to focus on assessing final or intermediate products, rather than the writing process. However, sensing technologies, such as keystroke logging, can enable provision of automated feedback during, and on aspects of, the writing process. Despite this potential, little is known about the critical indicators that can…
Descriptors: Automation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Learning Analytics
Tsai, Shu-Chiao – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
This study investigates the effectiveness of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing, keyed to the perceptions of both more highly proficient Chinese English major university students and less-proficient non-English majors. After watching a 5-minute passage from a movie, each cohort of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Translation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Guo, Qian; Feng, Ruiling; Hua, Yuanfang – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
AWCF can facilitate academic writing development, especially for novice writers of English as a foreign language (EFL). Existing AWCF studies mainly focus on teacher and learner perceptions; fewer have investigated the error-correction effect of AWCF and factors related to the effect. Especially lacking is research on how successfully students can…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Yang, Yu-Fen – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2018
This study reports on how students construct new language knowledge by indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Indirect feedback (text organization, reader-based perspectives, and clarity of purpose) encourages students to negotiate meaning instead of merely copying peers' direct feedback on grammatical corrections. According to the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Collaborative Writing, Questionnaires, Language Proficiency