Descriptor
Data Collection | 4 |
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Evaluators | 4 |
Data Analysis | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Bilingual Education | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Community Involvement | 1 |
Court Role | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Evaluation and… | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Sadler, D. Royce – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981
Potential sources of bias are classified as ethical compromises, value inertias, or cognitive limitations. Thirteen specifics of intuitive thinking and judgmental processes are described. The author wishes to alert naturalistic evaluators to common failings. This list can be a useful checklist in reducing, integrating and drawing inferences from…
Descriptors: Bias, Cognitive Processes, Data Analysis, Data Collection

Brown, Robert D.; Newman, Dianna L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
In a simulated adversary-advocacy evaluation of a computer-assisted school guidance program, the evaluation audience's reaction to different forms of data, the order of argument presentations, and the rated attitude of the evaluator are shown to influence audience agreement with evaluation recommendations. (CM)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators

La Belle, Thomas J.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Using examples from an evaluation design of a bilingual preschool program, the authors have developed a paradigm resting on contextually based evaluation and involving implementation strategies and participant researchers. Multiple methods of gathering environment-specific data are used in the process. (MH)
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Cultural Context, Data Collection, Educational Assessment

Wolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection