Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Advanced Placement | 1 |
| Animation | 1 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Inquiry | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Chemical Education | 1 |
Author
| Prilliman, Stephen G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPrilliman, Stephen G. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2014
The College Board's recently revised curriculum for advanced placement (AP) chemistry places a strong emphasis on conceptual understanding, including representations of particle phenomena. This change in emphasis is informed by years of research showing that students could perform algorithmic calculations but not explain those calculations…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Secondary School Science, High Schools, College Science
