NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Mark D. Reckase – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In computerized adaptive testing, item exposure control methods are often used to provide a more balanced usage of the item pool. Many of the most popular methods, including the restricted method (Revuelta and Ponsoda), use a single maximum exposure rate to limit the proportion of times that each item is administered. However, Barrada et al.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lim, Hwanggyu; Choe, Edison M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
The residual differential item functioning (RDIF) detection framework was developed recently under a linear testing context. To explore the potential application of this framework to computerized adaptive testing (CAT), the present study investigated the utility of the RDIF[subscript R] statistic both as an index for detecting uniform DIF of…
Descriptors: Test Items, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory, Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Chia-Wen; Wang, Wen-Chung; Chiu, Ming Ming; Ro, Sage – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
The use of computerized adaptive testing algorithms for ranking items (e.g., college preferences, career choices) involves two major challenges: unacceptably high computation times (selecting from a large item pool with many dimensions) and biased results (enhanced preferences or intensified examinee responses because of repeated statements across…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cui, Zhongmin; Liu, Chunyan; He, Yong; Chen, Hanwei – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2018
Allowing item review in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is getting more attention in the educational measurement field as more and more testing programs adopt CAT. The research literature has shown that allowing item review in an educational test could result in more accurate estimates of examinees' abilities. The practice of item review in…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Test Wiseness