Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Feedback | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Mathematics Tests | 1 |
| Microcomputers | 1 |
| Pretests Posttests | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedVispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Studied effects of administration mode [computer adaptive test (CAT) versus self-adaptive test (SAT)], item-by-item answer feedback, and test anxiety on results from computerized vocabulary tests taken by 293 college students. CATs were more reliable than SATs, and administration time was less when feedback was provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewedBirenbaum, Menucha; Tatsuoka, Kikumi K. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1987
The present study examined the effect of three modes of feedback on the seriousness of error types committed on a post-test. The effect of the feedback made on post-test errors was found to be differential and dependent upon the seriousness of errors committed on the pre-test. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Error Patterns, Feedback, Junior High Schools
