Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Reader Response | 2 |
| Reading Ability | 2 |
| Sequential Learning | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Group Discussion | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Linguistics | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
| Eiter, Brianna | 1 |
| Inhoff, Albrecht W. | 1 |
| Pollatsek, Alexander | 1 |
| Radach, Ralph | 1 |
| Rayner, Keith | 1 |
| Reichle, Erik D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPollatsek, Alexander; Reichle, Erik D.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
In their article, "Time Course of Linguistic Information Extraction from Consecutive Words During Eye Fixations in Reading," A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (see EJ735287) reported the results of two experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Eye Movements, Serial Learning, Experiments
Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Radach, Ralph; Eiter, Brianna – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
A. Pollatsek, E. D. Reichle, and K. Rayner argue that the critical findings in A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach are in general agreement with core assumptions of sequential attention shift models if additional assumptions and facts are considered. The current authors critically discuss the hypothesized time line of processing and indicate…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Word Recognition, Verbal Stimuli, Neurolinguistics
