NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Robert W. Danielson; Benjamin C. Heddy; Onur Ramazan; Gan Jin; Kanvarbir S. Gill; Danielle N. Berry – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2025
Misinformation has been extensively studied as both maliciously intended propaganda and accidentally experienced incorrect assumptions. We contend that "conceptual contamination" is the process by which the learning of incorrect information interferes, pollutes, or otherwise disrupts the learning of correct information. This is similar…
Descriptors: Misinformation, Propaganda, Deception, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Breslyn, Wayne; McGinnis, J. Randy; McDonald, R. Christopher; Hestness, Emily – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2016
We present research from an investigation on developing a learning progression (LP) for sea level rise (SLR), a major effect of global climate change. We began our research by drafting a hypothetical LP for sea level rise, informed by extant knowledge of the topic in the scientific community, in science education literature, and in science…
Descriptors: Climate, Science Education, Middle School Students, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feldman, Allan; Divoll, Kent; Rogan-Klyve, Allyson – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009
This study examined an interdisciplinary scientific research project to understand how graduate and undergraduate honors students learn to do science. It was found that the education of the students occurs as part of an apprenticeship. The apprenticeship takes place in research groups. In general, research groups are structured in two ways:…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Interdisciplinary Approach, Academically Gifted, Honors Curriculum
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bowen, G. Michael; Roth, Wolff-Michael; McGinn, Michelle K. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1999
Describes a study of the similarities and differences in graph-related interpretations between scientists and college students engaged in collective graph interpretation. Concludes that while many students learned to provide correct answers to scientific graphing questions, they did not come to make linguistic distinctions or increase their…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Graphs, Higher Education, Instructional Materials