NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mazer, Joseph P. – Communication Education, 2018
Discussions surrounding ideology and free speech on college and university campuses continually occur in the popular press. In this forum, Herbeck (see EJ1171161) chronicles several heated clashes over free speech that have recently erupted on campuses across the country, fueling news stories reported through traditional and social media. Issues…
Descriptors: Freedom of Speech, College Environment, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Ideology
Oleen-Junk, Nicholas A. – ProQuest LLC, 2018
Scholars in the helping professions have become increasingly concerned with how the fruits of their labor can promote social justice (e.g., Vera & Speight, 2003; Swank & Fahs, 2013, North, 2009). At present, there is a lack of theoretical convergence around what social justice consciousness, aptitude, awareness, or orientation actually…
Descriptors: Social Justice, Moral Development, Cognitive Development, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C. – Child Development, 1997
Examined children's, adolescents', and college students' judgments of children's and adults' rights to freedom of speech and religion in societal, school, and family contexts. Found that endorsements of these freedoms were increasingly affected by social context and agent with age. College students were less likely than others to affirm children's…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Attitudes, Children
Oliver, Lauren – 1987
Arguments for and against banning television commercials aimed at children under age 12, as well as the role of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the First Amendment, and parents in regulating such commercials, are explored in this paper. Following an introduction that describes the controversy, a second section of the paper details the…
Descriptors: Advertising, Children, Childrens Rights, Childrens Television
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moshman, D. – Human Development, 1993
Argues that inconsistency in addressing issues of students' rights is widespread, even in Supreme Court decisions. Proposes that the rebuttable presumption of adolescent maturity is justified by psychological evidence. Extends the analysis to considerations of intellectual freedom in public secondary schools, governmental constraints on…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cognitive Development, Court Litigation, Decision Making