NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bauer, Daniel J.; Sterba, Sonya K. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Previous research has compared methods of estimation for fitting multilevel models to binary data, but there are reasons to believe that the results will not always generalize to the ordinal case. This article thus evaluates (a) whether and when fitting multilevel linear models to ordinal outcome data is justified and (b) which estimator to employ…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Computation, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bird, Kevin D. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Any set of confidence interval inferences on J - 1 linearly independent contrasts on J means, such as the two comparisons [mu][subscript 1] - [mu][subscript 2] and [mu][subscript 2] - [mu][subscript 3] on 3 means, provides a basis for the deduction of interval inferences on all other contrasts, such as the redundant comparison [mu][subscript 1] -…
Descriptors: Intervals, Statistical Analysis, Inferences, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pan, Tianshu; Yin, Yue – Psychological Methods, 2012
In the discussion of mean square difference (MSD) and standard error of measurement (SEM), Barchard (2012) concluded that the MSD between 2 sets of test scores is greater than 2(SEM)[superscript 2] and SEM underestimates the score difference between 2 tests when the 2 tests are not parallel. This conclusion has limitations for 2 reasons. First,…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Geometric Concepts, Tests, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Lijuan; Hamaker, Ellen; Bergeman, C. S. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Intra-individual variability over a short period of time may contain important information about how individuals differ from each other. In this article we begin by discussing diverse indicators for quantifying intra-individual variability and indicate their advantages and disadvantages. Then we propose an alternative method that models…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Data Analysis, Individual Differences, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McGrath, Robert E.; Walters, Glenn D. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Statistical analyses investigating latent structure can be divided into those that estimate structural model parameters and those that detect the structural model type. The most basic distinction among structure types is between categorical (discrete) and dimensional (continuous) models. It is a common, and potentially misleading, practice to…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morey, Richard D.; Rouder, Jeffrey N. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Psychological theories are statements of constraint. The role of hypothesis testing in psychology is to test whether specific theoretical constraints hold in data. Bayesian statistics is well suited to the task of finding supporting evidence for constraint, because it allows for comparing evidence for 2 hypotheses against each another. One issue…
Descriptors: Evidence, Intervals, Testing, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keselman, H. J.; Miller, Charles W.; Holland, Burt – Psychological Methods, 2011
There have been many discussions of how Type I errors should be controlled when many hypotheses are tested (e.g., all possible comparisons of means, correlations, proportions, the coefficients in hierarchical models, etc.). By and large, researchers have adopted familywise (FWER) control, though this practice certainly is not universal. Familywise…
Descriptors: Validity, Statistical Significance, Probability, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Thomas D.; Steiner, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2010
In this article, we note the many ontological, epistemological, and methodological similarities between how Campbell and Rubin conceptualize causation. We then explore 3 differences in their written emphases about individual case matching in observational studies. We contend that (a) Campbell places greater emphasis than Rubin on the special role…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Pretests Posttests, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dekle, Dawn J.; Leung, Denis H. Y.; Zhu, Min – Psychological Methods, 2008
Across many areas of psychology, concordance is commonly used to measure the (intragroup) agreement in ranking a number of items by a group of judges. Sometimes, however, the judges come from multiple groups, and in those situations, the interest is to measure the concordance between groups, under the assumption that there is some within-group…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Psychological Studies, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lubke, Gitta H.; Muthen, Bengt – Psychological Methods, 2005
Sources of population heterogeneity may or may not be observed. If the sources of heterogeneity are observed (e.g., gender), the sample can be split into groups and the data analyzed with methods for multiple groups. If the sources of population heterogeneity are unobserved, the data can be analyzed with latent class models. Factor mixture models…
Descriptors: Youth, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bockenholt, Ulf – Psychological Methods, 2004
Although comparative judgment methods have a number of distinct advantages over ratings, they share one common problem: On the basis of comparative judgments, it is not possible to recover the origin of item evaluations. One item may be judged more positively than another, but this result does not allow any conclusions about whether either of the…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Individual Differences, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Bockenholt, Ulf – Psychological Methods, 2005
L. L. Thurstone's (1927) model provides a powerful framework for modeling individual differences in choice behavior. An overview of Thurstonian models for comparative data is provided, including the classical Case V and Case III models as well as more general choice models with unrestricted and factor-analytic covariance structures. A flow chart…
Descriptors: Flow Charts, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferrando, Pere J.; Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano – Psychological Methods, 2005
This article describes a general item response theory-based factor analytic procedure that allows assessment of the equivalence between 2 administrative modes of a questionnaire: paper and pencil, and Internet based. The theoretical relations between the present procedure and other methods used in previous empirical research are shown, and the…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Item Response Theory, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing