Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Stimuli | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Daily Living Skills | 1 |
| Discrimination Learning | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Feedback | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Literacy Education | 1 |
| Mental Retardation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research in Developmental… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSmeets, Paul M.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1990
Two time-delay conditions for teaching complex visual discriminations to 14 normal preschoolers, 12 with mild mental retardation, and 11 with moderate mental retardation were compared. Results indicated that for all populations and stimuli, time delay of multiple dynamic distinctive-feature prompts produced learning, while time delay of the single…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedLalli, Joseph S.; Browder, Diane M. – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1993
The effectiveness and efficiency of stimulus fading, stimulus shaping, time delay, and a feedback only procedure were compared in teaching three adults with moderate developmental delays sight words. Results showed no clear advantage for any one procedure. The benefit of conducting a preliminary evaluation of instructional procedures during…
Descriptors: Adults, Comparative Analysis, Daily Living Skills, Efficiency
