NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Williams, Joseph J.; Griffiths, Thomas L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Errors in detecting randomness are often explained in terms of biases and misconceptions. We propose and provide evidence for an account that characterizes the contribution of the inherent statistical difficulty of the task. Our account is based on a Bayesian statistical analysis, focusing on the fact that a random process is a special case of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Bias, Misconceptions, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murayama, Kou; Sakaki, Michiko; Yan, Veronica X.; Smith, Garry M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
In order to examine metacognitive accuracy (i.e., the relationship between metacognitive judgment and memory performance), researchers often rely on by-participant analysis, where metacognitive accuracy (e.g., resolution, as measured by the gamma coefficient or signal detection measures) is computed for each participant and the computed values are…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Accuracy, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kromrey, Jeffrey D.; Rendina-Gobioff, Gianna – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
The performance of methods for detecting publication bias in meta-analysis was evaluated using Monte Carlo methods. Four methods of bias detection were investigated: Begg's rank correlation, Egger's regression, funnel plot regression, and trim and fill. Five factors were included in the simulation design: number of primary studies in each…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Correlation
Johnson, Ronald W.; Adair, John G. – Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1972
Bias effect was mainly accounted for by male experimenters testing subjects under conditions of nonautomated stimulus presentation and by female experimenters testing subjects under automated conditions. (Authors)
Descriptors: Bias, Comparative Analysis, Error Patterns, Examiners