NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 115 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fan, Xitao; Sun, Shaojing – Journal of Early Adolescence, 2014
In adolescence research, the treatment of measurement reliability is often fragmented, and it is not always clear how different reliability coefficients are related. We show that generalizability theory (G-theory) is a comprehensive framework of measurement reliability, encompassing all other reliability methods (e.g., Pearson "r,"…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Measurement, Reliability, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hallam, Rena A.; Lyons, Ashley N.; Pretti-Frontczak, Kristie; Grisham-Brown, Jennifer – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2014
The assessment of young children in early childhood special education is a central area of educational practice. The results of child assessments often have significant implications for young children, their families, and the programs that serve them, including eligibility for special education services, instructional planning, and documentation…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Special Education, Child Development, Measures (Individuals)
Dorans, Neil J.; Liang, Longjuan; Puhan, Gautam – Educational Testing Service, 2010
Scores are the most visible and widely used products of a testing program. The choice of score scale has implications for test specifications, equating, and test reliability and validity, as well as for test interpretation. At the same time, the score scale should be viewed as infrastructure likely to require repair at some point. In this report…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Standard Setting (Scoring), Test Interpretation, Certification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mehrens, William A.; Lehmann, Irvin J. – Journal of Counseling & Development, 1985
Addresses the issue of counselor expertise in test interpretation. Discusses norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced interpretation, interpreting the precision of the information, interpreting the meaning of the construct and its relevance to the decision, and general precautions regarding test interpretation. (LLL)
Descriptors: Counselor Qualifications, Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Test Interpretation
Angoff, William H. – College Board Review, 1974
There is no conflict between interpretation of criterion-referenced tests, interpretation of norm referenced tests, and the SAT, nor should on be thought superior to the other in some sense. Each should supplement the other. (Author/PG)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Higher Education, Norm Referenced Tests, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunter, Madeline – Educational Considerations, 1991
To realize the dividends from the relationship between testing and teaching, teacher and administrator preparation and inservice training must be redesigned so that professionals are equipped to interpret results from norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests designed by experts. (JOW)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Teacher Education, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Livingston, Samuel A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
Author replies to article TM 500 559. (MB)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Measurement Techniques, Norm Referenced Tests, Scoring
Shermis, Mark D.; DiVesta, Francis J. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2011
"Classroom Assessment in Action" clarifies the multi-faceted roles of measurement and assessment and their applications in a classroom setting. Comprehensive in scope, Shermis and Di Vesta explain basic measurement concepts and show students how to interpret the results of standardized tests. From these basic concepts, the authors then…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests, Scores, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kempa, R. F.; L'Odiaga, J. – Educational Research, 1984
Examines the extent to which grades derived from a conventional norm-referenced examination can be interpreted in terms of criterion-referenced performance assessments of different abilities and skills. Results suggest that performance is more affected by test format and subject matter than by the intellectual abilities tested by them. (JOW)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Test Construction, Test Format
McCray, Emajean; Lottes, John – 1976
Principles are established for reaching valid decisions as to whether evaluative judgments should be norm referenced or criterion referenced. A set of decision rules is presented, in flow chart form, to serve as a guide to the decision-making process. The use of these decision rules is illustrated for a variety of practical situations. The…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Curriculum, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Millman, Jason – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1994
The unfulfilled promise of criterion-referenced measurement is that it would permit valid inferences about what a student could and could not do. To come closest to achieving all that criterion-referenced testing originally promised, tests of higher item density, with more items per amount of domain, are required. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational History, Inferences, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brennan, Robert L.; Kane, Michael T. – Psychometrika, 1977
Using the assumption of randomly parallel tests and concepts from generalizability theory, three signal/noise ratios for domain-referenced tests are developed, discussed, and compared. The three ratios have the same noise but different signals depending upon the kind of decision to be made as a result of measurement. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Error of Measurement, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1994
The term "criterion-referenced measurement" has been so frequently used that accumulated surplus meaning has sometimes swamped the fundamental concept. Stripping away extraneous interpretations affirms the contemporary relevance of the concept. Substituting the term "construct-referenced" underscores the need for better…
Descriptors: Behaviorism, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Learning
Mehrens, William A.; Ebel, Robert L. – NCME Measurement in Education, 1979
The discussion on criterion-referenced (CRT) and norm-referenced achievement tests (NRT) is divided into two parts: definitions and use. The authors contrast CRTs, tests which compare an individual's performance to some specified behavioral criterion of proficiency, and NRTs, tests which compare an individual's score to scores of others. They also…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Definitions, Mastery Tests
Jackson, Rex – 1970
Present definitions of the criterion-referenced test are discussed, insufficiences noted, and a new definition proposed. Some examples of criterion-referenced tests are examined and used to educe some general principles for the development of such tests. The utility of item form processes is assessed. It is suggested that the difficulty of…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Norm Referenced Tests
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8