NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 246 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nandita Bhanja Chaudhuri; Debayan Dhar – International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2024
Evaluation in Design education is subjective and generally depends upon the pedagogues' personal perspective. Conducting subjective evaluation on a large scale is associated with multiple challenges; therefore, digitized evaluation is integral to maintain consistency in the evaluation process. This systematic literature review utilized SCOPUS, Web…
Descriptors: Creativity, Design, Evaluation Methods, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nadira Dayo; Sameh Said Metwaly; Wim Van Den Noortgate – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) may offer a reliable and internally valid way to evaluate technology-enhanced learning (TEL). A systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of what, why and how SCEDs are used to evaluate TEL. Accordingly, 136 studies from nine databases fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. The…
Descriptors: Technology Uses in Education, Technology Integration, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2022
Education decisionmakers need access to the best evidence about the effectiveness of education interventions, including practices, products, programs, and policies. It can be difficult, time consuming, and costly to access and draw conclusions from relevant studies about the effectiveness of interventions. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Standards, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hillary E. Merzdorf; Donna Jaison; Morgan B. Weaver; Julie Linsey; Tracy Hammond; Kerrie A. Douglas – Journal of Engineering Education, 2024
Background: Sketching exists in many disciplines and varies in how it is assessed, making it challenging to define fundamental sketching skills and the characteristics of a high-quality sketch. For instructors to apply effective strategies for teaching and assessing engineering sketching, a clear summary of the constructs, metrics, and objectives…
Descriptors: Freehand Drawing, Engineering Education, Educational Research, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2020
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) systematic review process is the basis of many of its products, enabling the WWC to use consistent, objective, and transparent standards and procedures in its reviews, while also ensuring comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. The WWC systematic review process consists of five steps: (1) Developing…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Research Reports, Standards
Alyson S. Busse – ProQuest LLC, 2024
The purpose of this study was to assess and describe the status of program evaluation within the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) sites. The National Science Foundation's REU program supports thousands of undergraduates annually in hands-on, immersive research experiences under the mentorship of…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yousef, Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy; Khatiry, Ahmed Ramadan – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
Several governments across the world have temporarily closed educational institutions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, numerous universities have seen a growing trend towards online learning scenarios. Thus, learning takes place not just within a person, but within and across the networks. However, the current implementations of open…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Individualized Instruction, Reflection, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toluchuri Shalini Shanker Rao; Kaushal Kumar Bhagat – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024
Computational thinking (CT) has received growing interest as a research subject in the last decade, with research contributions attempting to capitalize on the benefits that CT may provide. This study included a systematic analysis aimed at revealing current trends in the CT subject, identifying educational interventions, and emerging assessment…
Descriptors: Computation, Thinking Skills, Educational Research, Skill Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
John Deke; Mariel Finucane; Dan Thal – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022
Background/Context: Methodological background: Meta-analysis typically depends on the assumption that true effects follow the normal distribution. While assuming normality of effect "estimates" is often supported by a central limit theorem, normality for the distribution of interventions' "true" effects is a computational…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
George Kinnear; Ian Jones; Chris Sangwin; Maryam Alarfaj; Ben Davies; Sam Fearn; Colin Foster; André Heck; Karen Henderson; Tim Hunt; Paola Iannone; Igor' Kontorovich; Niclas Larson; Tim Lowe; John Christopher Meyer; Ann O'Shea; Peter Rowlett; Indunil Sikurajapathi; Thomas Wong – International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2024
This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Study, College Mathematics, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Christina Weiland; Rebecca Unterman; Susan Dynarski; Rachel Abenavoli; Howard Bloom; Breno Braga; Anne-Marie Faria; Erica Greenberg; Brian A. Jacob; Jane Arnold Lincove; Karen Manship; Meghan McCormick; Luke Miratrix; Tomás E. Monarrez; Pamela Morris-Perez; Anna Shapiro; Jon Valant; Lindsay Weixler – Grantee Submission, 2024
Lottery-based identification strategies offer potential for generating the next generation of evidence on U.S. early education programs. The authors' collaborative network of five research teams applying this design in early education settings and methods experts has identified six challenges that need to be carefully considered in this next…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Admission (School)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Christina Weiland; Rebecca Unterman; Susan Dynarski; Rachel Abenavoli; Howard Bloom; Breno Braga; Anne-Marie Faria; Erica Greenberg; Brian A. Jacob; Jane Arnold Lincove; Karen Manship; Meghan McCormick; Luke Miratrix; Tomás E. Monarrez; Pamela Morris-Perez; Anna Shapiro; Jon Valant; Lindsay Weixler – AERA Open, 2024
Lottery-based identification strategies offer potential for generating the next generation of evidence on U.S. early education programs. The authors' collaborative network of five research teams applying this design in early education settings and methods experts has identified six challenges that need to be carefully considered in this next…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Admission (School)
Elizabeth Talbott; Andres De Los Reyes; Devin M. Kearns; Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez; Mo Wang – Exceptional Children, 2023
Evidence-based assessment (EBA) requires that investigators employ scientific theories and research findings to guide decisions about what domains to measure, how and when to measure them, and how to make decisions and interpret results. To implement EBA, investigators need high-quality assessment tools along with evidence-based processes. We…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Evaluation Methods, Special Education, Educational Research
Christina Weiland; Rebecca Unterman; Susan Dynarski; Rachel Abenavoli; Howard Bloom; Breno Braga; Anne-Marie Faria; Erica Greenberg; Brian Jacob; Jane Arnold Lincove; Karen Manship; Meghan McCormick; Luke Miratrix; Tomás E. Monarrez; Pamela Morris-Perez; Anna Shapiro; Jon Valant; Lindsay Weixler – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2023
Lottery-based identification strategies offer potential for generating the next generation of evidence on U.S. early education programs. Our collaborative network of five research teams applying this design in early education and methods experts has identified six challenges that need to be carefully considered in this next context: (1) available…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Admission (School)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2020
This supplement concerns Appendix E of the "What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Procedures Handbook, Version 4.1." The supplement extends the range of designs and analyses that can generate effect size and standard error estimates for the WWC. This supplement presents several new standard error formulas for cluster-level assignment studies,…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Effect Size, Research Design
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  17