Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Addition | 3 |
Arithmetic | 3 |
Multiplication | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Problem Solving | 2 |
Access to Information | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
Encoding (Psychology) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fayol, Michel; Thevenot, Catherine – Cognition, 2012
In a first experiment, adults were asked to solve one-digit additions, subtractions and multiplications. When the sign appeared 150 ms before the operands, addition and subtraction were solved faster than when the sign and the operands appeared simultaneously on screen. This priming effect was not observed for multiplication problems. A second…
Descriptors: Priming, Memory, Subtraction, Multiplication

Campbell, Jamie I. D. – Cognition, 1994
Sixty-four adults were tested on simple addition and multiplication problems presented in Arabic digit or English number-word format. Overall, response times and error rates were much higher with the word format, but more important, presentation format interacted with arithmetic operation and problem size. (DR)
Descriptors: Addition, Adults, Arithmetic, Cognitive Processes

Blankenberger, Sven – Cognition, 2001
Examined two possible explanations for the arithmetic tie effect: faster encoding of tie problems versus faster access to arithmetic facts. Found that the tie effect vanished with heterogeneous addition problems, and for seven out of eight participants, the effect vanished with heterogeneous multiplication problems. Concludes that the tie effect…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Addition, Arithmetic, College Students