NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Neyedli, Heather F.; Welsh, Timothy N. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2013
Previous research has revealed that people choose to aim toward an "optimal" endpoint when faced with a movement task with externally imposed payoffs. This optimal endpoint is modeled based on the magnitude of the payoffs and the probability of hitting the different payoff regions (endpoint variability). Endpoint selection, however, has only been…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Probability, Classification, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patching, Geoffrey R.; Englund, Mats P.; Hellstrom, Ake – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2012
Despite the importance of both response probability and response time for testing models of choice, there is a dearth of chronometric studies examining systematic asymmetries that occur over time- and space-orders in the method of paired comparisons. In this study, systematic asymmetries in discriminating the magnitude of paired visual stimuli are…
Descriptors: Computation, Visual Stimuli, Probability, Reaction Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Monsell, Stephen; Mizon, Guy A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
In 6 task-cuing experiments, with 2 cues per task, the authors varied cue-stimulus interval to investigate G. D. Logan and C. Bundesen's (2003) claim that when cue repetition is controlled for, task-switch cost and its reduction with preparation are largely eliminated and hence cannot index an endogenous control process. Experiment 1 replicates…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Models, Cues, Intervals