NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 65 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Polasky, Sarah; Wilson, Jeannie; Carsen, JulieAnna; Stover, Lillian; Cowley, Shelby; Nielsen, Ann – Research Management Review, 2023
The impact of resubmission assistance on grant proposal success is relatively unknown. Given that a significant proportion of proposals, up to 90%, are rejected by the sponsor, this lack of information makes it difficult for Research Development (RD) professionals to decide whether to invest resources in this service. This study responded to New…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Research and Development, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
João M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnston, Lucy; Schluter, Philip J. – Studies in Higher Education, 2017
With increasing competition for postgraduate research scholarships, awarding processes demand attention and scrutiny. We examine inter-rater reliability for two prestigious New Zealand scholarships, the Shirtcliffe Fellowship and the Gordon Watson Scholarship. For each scholarship, five assessors (three academic; two non-academic) independently…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Scholarships, Academic Achievement, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J.; Tobin, Stacey C. – Journal of Research Administration, 2015
While Elizabeth Barrett Browning counted 25 ways in which she loves her husband in her poem, "How Do I Love Thee? Let me Count the Ways," we identified only eight ways to evaluate the potential for success of a federal research grant proposal. This may be surprising, as it seems upon initial glance of the review criteria used by various…
Descriptors: Public Agencies, Grants, Program Proposals, Evaluation Criteria
Sawchuk, Stephen – Education Week, 2011
National Education Association (NEA) officials announced last week that they would put a "policy statement" before the union's governing body for approval that, among other changes, would open the door to the use of "valid, reliable, high-quality standardized tests" of student learning, in combination with multiple other measures, for evaluating…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Accountability, Evaluation Criteria, National Standards
Sawchuk, Stephen; Maxwell, Lesli A. – Education Week, 2010
As peer reviewers for the U.S. Department of Education begin to comb through the thousands of pages of applications for $4 billion in federal Race to the Top Fund grants, they'll be under pressure to determine which are most worthy of funding: those that promise the most, or those with the best chance of delivering. In a competition whose criteria…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Academic Achievement, Competition, Educational Change
Henson, Kenneth T. – School Administrator, 2012
The economy has school districts in a stranglehold. But there is a way out. Despite beliefs to the contrary, the grant money pot has not dried up. The author's book "Successful Grant Writing for School Leaders: 10 Easy Steps" shares strategies and success stories from some of his own 30 school grants and from school districts small and…
Descriptors: Economic Climate, School Districts, Grants, Grantsmanship
Jones, Jessika – California Postsecondary Education Commission, 2011
The California Postsecondary Education Commission is directed by state law to review and comment on new academic program proposals from the University of California (UC), the California State University (CSU) and the community colleges. Program review is one of the CPEC's primary responsibilities--it coordinates the systems' long-range plans,…
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Program Proposals, Annual Reports, College Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guasch, Teresa; Alvarez, Ibis; Espasa, Anna – Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 2010
This paper attempts to shed light on the competencies a university teacher must have in order to teach in virtual learning environments. A teacher training experience was designed by taking into account the methodological criteria established in line with previous theoretical principles. The main objective of our analysis was to identify the…
Descriptors: Virtual Classrooms, Teacher Competencies, Educational Environment, College Faculty
Teacher Education Accreditation Council, 2012
The Teacher Education Accreditation Council's (TEAC's) "Guide to Accreditation" is primarily for the faculty, staff, and administrators of TEAC member programs. It is designed for use in preparing for both initial and continuing accreditation. Program personnel should understand and accept all the components of the TEAC accreditation process…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Formative Evaluation, Distance Education, Glossaries
California Postsecondary Education Commission, 2008
In 2008, the California Community Colleges Board of Governors amended its Title 5 Regulations to include provisions for granting conditional approval for educational centers. Prior regulations pertained to full or final approval only. The Commission's current guidelines do not contain provisions for conditional approval. This agenda item outlines…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Guidelines, State Regulation, Educational Policy
Teacher Education Accreditation Council, 2011
The Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) "Guide to Accreditation" includes a full description of TEAC's principles and standards, the accreditation process and audit, and detailed instruction on writing the "Brief." This revision includes expanded information on (1) preparing an "Inquiry Brief Proposal" and the audit of the "Inquiry…
Descriptors: Distance Education, Accreditation (Institutions), Glossaries, Federal Regulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schroter, Daniela C.; Coryn, Chris L. S.; Montrosse, Bianca E. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
Peer review is an umbrella term that refers to a class of selection and oversight practices, including the familiar mechanisms of the review of proposals submitted for funding, of manuscripts for scholarly publications, and of personnel qualifications and portfolios for selection and promotion. Peer review has long been a cornerstone of modern…
Descriptors: Conferences (Gatherings), Graduate Students, Scientific Methodology, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Grace K. L.; Chan, Edwin H. W. – Social Indicators Research, 2008
The problem of urban decay in Hong Kong is getting worse recently; therefore, the importance of urban renewal in improving the physical environment conditions and the living standards of the citizens is widely recognized in the territory. However, it is not an easy task for the Hong Kong Government to prepare welcome urban renewal proposals…
Descriptors: Living Standards, Foreign Countries, Urban Renewal, Physical Environment
Teacher Education Accreditation Council, 2010
This workbook is about producing the "Inquiry Brief" or "Inquiry Brief Proposal" for TEAC (Teacher Education Accreditation Council) accreditation. It is designed as a companion to the TEAC "Guide to Accreditation." The exercises in this workbook are selected by the writing workshop presenters to help program faculty get started on their "Brief."…
Descriptors: Educational Planning, Workbooks, Writing Workshops, Accreditation (Institutions)
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5