NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feingold, Alan – Review of Educational Research, 1993
The second approach used by L. V. Hedges and L. Friedman (1993) in their reanalysis of Feingold's earlier results is conceptually equivalent and yields results consistent with the original interpretation. The first method yields results that are discrepant. Analyses of variations in tail effect sizes are planned. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Effect Size, Females, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hedges, Larry V.; Friedman, Lynn – Review of Educational Research, 1993
Feingold's reply illustrates that his steps in characterizing tail effect sizes are not the calculations the authors had imagined. Attempting to reproduce Feingold's calculations, the authors still often find themselves in disagreement with interpretations Feingold has placed in his table. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Effect Size, Females, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hedges, Larry V.; Friedman, Lynn – Review of Educational Research, 1993
Analyzes effect sizes in tails of distribution of scores in Feingold's study of joint effects of gender differences in mean and variability on 28 cognitive-ability scales. Effect sizes are smaller than Feingold assumed. Evaluates joint effect of gender differences by number of males and females in extreme score ranges. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Effect Size, Equations (Mathematics), Females