Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Geometric Concepts | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Comparative Testing | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Geometry | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Davis, Laurie Laughlin | 1 |
Irfan Simsek | 1 |
Keng, Leslie | 1 |
McClarty, Katie Larsen | 1 |
Meijer, Rob R. | 1 |
Pinar Guner | 1 |
Tugba Uygun | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tugba Uygun; Pinar Guner; Irfan Simsek – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2024
This study was conducted to reveal potential sources of students' difficulty and misconceptions about geometrical concepts with the help of eye tracking. In this study, the students' geometrical misconceptions were explored by answering the questions on the geometry test prepared based on the literature and test-taking processes and represented…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Geometric Concepts, Mathematics Instruction, Misconceptions
Keng, Leslie; McClarty, Katie Larsen; Davis, Laurie Laughlin – Applied Measurement in Education, 2008
This article describes a comparative study conducted at the item level for paper and online administrations of a statewide high stakes assessment. The goal was to identify characteristics of items that may have contributed to mode effects. Item-level analyses compared two modes of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) for up to four…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Geometric Concepts, Grade 8, Comparative Analysis
Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
Two new methods have been proposed to determine unexpected sum scores on sub-tests (testlets) both for paper-and-pencil tests and computer adaptive tests. A method based on a conservative bound using the hypergeometric distribution, denoted p, was compared with a method where the probability for each score combination was calculated using a…
Descriptors: Probability, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Scores