Descriptor
Language Universals | 4 |
Sentence Structure | 4 |
Sentences | 4 |
Structural Analysis | 3 |
Syntax | 3 |
Deep Structure | 2 |
English | 2 |
Linguistic Theory | 2 |
Linguistics | 2 |
Phrase Structure | 2 |
Transformational Generative… | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Linguistique | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lo Jocomo, Francois – Linguistique, 1977
A study of the predicate adjective in Esperanto based on the opposition established between the complementary classifications, monemes and words. Because morphological complications do not exist in Esperanto, study of the two classifications could proceed to the benefit of the study of other languages. (Text is in French.) (AMH)
Descriptors: Artificial Languages, Language Universals, Linguistics, Morphology (Languages)
Johnson, Jeannette – 1968
This paper proposes a set of hypotheses on the nature of interrogration as a possible language universal. Examples and phrase structure rules and diagrams are given. Examining Tamazight and English, genetically unrelated languages with almost no contact, the author distinguishes two types of interrogation: (1) general, querying acceptability to…
Descriptors: Berber Languages, Contrastive Linguistics, English, Kernel Sentences

Oh, Choon-Kyu – 1970
In order to make linguistically significant generalizations in formulating transformational rules, a limited number of variables must be used. Such a limitation rule is the Complex Noun Phrase (NP) Constraint, active in English and, according to claims, universal. The fact that Korean synta, which is greatly different from English, also requires…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, English, Korean
van Oirsouw, Robert R. – 1978
The source of syntactic ambiguity and facts concerning the resolution of such ambiguity are discussed in this paper. The attitude of qenerative linguists towards ambiguity is examined, and a working distinction is drawn between vaqueness and ambiguity. The consequences of this distinction are then examined for syntactic ambiguity and an ordering…
Descriptors: Ambiguity, Deep Structure, Discourse Analysis, Grammar