NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuan, Lu; Huang, Yingshi; Li, Shuhang; Chen, Ping – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Online calibration is a key technology for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and has been widely used in various forms of CAT, including unidimensional CAT, multidimensional CAT (MCAT), CAT with polytomously scored items, and cognitive diagnostic CAT. However, as multidimensional and polytomous assessment data become more…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Computation, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; McBride, James R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2021
A key consideration when giving any computerized adaptive test (CAT) is how much adaptation is present when the test is used in practice. This study introduces a new framework to measure the amount of adaptation of Rasch-based CATs based on looking at the differences between the selected item locations (Rasch item difficulty parameters) of the…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Chia-Wen; Wang, Wen-Chung; Chiu, Ming Ming; Ro, Sage – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
The use of computerized adaptive testing algorithms for ranking items (e.g., college preferences, career choices) involves two major challenges: unacceptably high computation times (selecting from a large item pool with many dimensions) and biased results (enhanced preferences or intensified examinee responses because of repeated statements across…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chun Wang; Ping Chen; Shengyu Jiang – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
Many large-scale educational surveys have moved from linear form design to multistage testing (MST) design. One advantage of MST is that it can provide more accurate latent trait [theta] estimates using fewer items than required by linear tests. However, MST generates incomplete response data by design; hence, questions remain as to how to…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Items, Adaptive Testing, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsu, Chia-Ling; Wang, Wen-Chung – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2015
Cognitive diagnosis models provide profile information about a set of latent binary attributes, whereas item response models yield a summary report on a latent continuous trait. To utilize the advantages of both models, higher order cognitive diagnosis models were developed in which information about both latent binary attributes and latent…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Models, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pohl, Steffi – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013
This article introduces longitudinal multistage testing (lMST), a special form of multistage testing (MST), as a method for adaptive testing in longitudinal large-scale studies. In lMST designs, test forms of different difficulty levels are used, whereas the values on a pretest determine the routing to these test forms. Since lMST allows for…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Longitudinal Studies, Difficulty Level, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Jinming; Li, Jie – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
An IRT-based sequential procedure is developed to monitor items for enhancing test security. The procedure uses a series of statistical hypothesis tests to examine whether the statistical characteristics of each item under inspection have changed significantly during CAT administration. This procedure is compared with a previously developed…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mislevy, Jessica L.; Rupp, Andre A.; Harring, Jeffrey R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2012
A rapidly expanding arena for item response theory (IRT) is in attitudinal and health-outcomes survey applications, often with polytomous items. In particular, there is interest in computer adaptive testing (CAT). Meeting model assumptions is necessary to realize the benefits of IRT in this setting, however. Although initial investigations of…
Descriptors: Test Items, Investigations, Simulation, Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Finkelman, Matthew; Nering, Michael L.; Roussos, Louis A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
In computerized adaptive testing (CAT), ensuring the security of test items is a crucial practical consideration. A common approach to reducing item theft is to define maximum item exposure rates, i.e., to limit the proportion of examinees to whom a given item can be administered. Numerous methods for controlling exposure rates have been proposed…
Descriptors: Test Items, Adaptive Testing, Item Analysis, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wang, Tianyou; Vispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Used simulations of computerized adaptive tests to evaluate results yielded by four commonly used ability estimation methods: maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and three Bayesian approaches. Results show clear distinctions between MLE and Bayesian methods. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lei, Pui-Wa; Chen, Shu-Ying; Yu, Lan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2006
Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST, which have known difficulty in detecting non-unidirectional differential item functioning (DIF), have been adapted with some success for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This study adapts logistic regression (LR) and the item-response-theory-likelihood-ratio test (IRT-LRT), capable of detecting both unidirectional…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Test Bias, Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Regression Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
Two new methods have been proposed to determine unexpected sum scores on sub-tests (testlets) both for paper-and-pencil tests and computer adaptive tests. A method based on a conservative bound using the hypergeometric distribution, denoted p, was compared with a method where the probability for each score combination was calculated using a…
Descriptors: Probability, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Scores