Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Teaching Methods | 6 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Animals | 1 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Assignments | 1 |
Audience Awareness | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment Update | 6 |
Author
Bers, Trudy | 1 |
Brown, Bruce L. | 1 |
Danielle Schmidt Buehrer | 1 |
Kathryn D. Kloepper | 1 |
Kovala, Irene H. | 1 |
Lori L. Montalbano | 1 |
Olsen, Danny R. | 1 |
Pike, Gary R. | 1 |
Sharon Stoerger | 1 |
Troy R. Nash | 1 |
Weeks, Linda Ann | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Cote d'Ivoire | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lori L. Montalbano; Sharon Stoerger – Assessment Update, 2025
The post-pandemic expectations of today's students require greater innovation in teaching and learning. Rapidly changing technologies and software applications will drastically change how higher education is structured and disseminated. In this article, the authors examine the use of micro-credentialing, the potential and challenges of Artificial…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Educational Trends
Danielle Schmidt Buehrer; Kathryn D. Kloepper; Troy R. Nash – Assessment Update, 2024
To help faculty connect programmatic assessment with the advancement of their own scholarly agenda, a professional development series was created that introduces faculty to the mutual benefits of the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) and academic program assessment. An additional benefit to faculty for participating in assessment…
Descriptors: Workshops, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Teaching Methods
Olsen, Danny R.; Wygant, Steven A.; Brown, Bruce L. – Assessment Update, 2004
Recent advances in electronic data collection have opened broad new possibilities for educational assessment. Potentially significant savings in time, money, and effort make Web-based and e-mail-based surveys more and more attractive as alternatives to mail surveys and face-to-face interviews. Yet, as with any major change, questions and obstacles…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Mail Surveys, Computer Software, Teaching Methods
Weeks, Linda Ann – Assessment Update, 2004
In this article, the author shares how she used a video on animals to teach her graduate classes about subjectivity in assessment. For this video assessment, she made her students evaluate the video based on five categories: content, structure, sensitivity to audience, audio, and visual. As a teacher, she knows how impossible it is to be totally…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Videotape Recordings, Animals, Graduate Students
Bers, Trudy; Kovala, Irene H. – Assessment Update, 2004
During the spring semesters of 1999 through 2003, the general education subcommittee of Oakton Community College's (Des Plaines, Illinois) Student Academic Assessment Team (SAAT) implemented a locally developed institutional approach for assessing students' achievement of general education objectives. The overall process remained essentially the…
Descriptors: General Education, Community Colleges, Educational Objectives, Academic Achievement
Pike, Gary R. – Assessment Update, 2004
Recently the Educational Testing Service (ETS) has modified its Student Instructional Report II (SIR II) for use in online distance education courses. The SIR II is a second-generation survey based on more than thirty years of experience with student evaluations (Centra, 1998; Centra and Gaubatz, n.d.). The e-SIR II is based on the highly…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Distance Education, Educational Testing, Prior Learning