Descriptor
| Scoring Formulas | 4 |
| Sex Differences | 4 |
| Test Reliability | 4 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Confidence Testing | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Weighted Scores | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Group Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
| Rod and Frame Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllen, Mary J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Adults took the Rod and Frame, Portable Rod and Frame, and Embedded Figures Tests. Absolute and algebraic frame-effect scores were more reliable and valid than rod-effect algebraic scores. Correlations with the Embedded Figures Test were so low that the interchangeability of these field articulation measures is questionable. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Correlation, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedJacobs, Stanley S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Individual Differences, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Download full textRippey, Robert M. – 1972
This paper examines confidence testing, and reasons for using confidence tests. Different scoring systems are studied in order to clarify the meaning of significance of the weights which subjects assign to confidence scored tests. (DLG)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Decision Making, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Rippey, Robert M. – 1971
Technical improvements, which may be made in the reliability and validity of tests through confidence scores, are discussed. However, studies indicate that subjects do not handle their confidence uniformly. (MS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Confidence Testing, Correlation, Difficulty Level
