Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Assessing Writing | 1 |
Educational Research and… | 1 |
English Journal | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Reading & Writing Quarterly | 1 |
Author
Anderson, Sue | 1 |
Dappen, Leon | 1 |
Dudley, Martha | 1 |
Isernhagen, Jody | 1 |
Lane, Suzanne | 1 |
Morlock, Larissa | 1 |
Olinghouse, Natalie G. | 1 |
Overton, June | 1 |
Parke, Carol S. | 1 |
Saylor, Kim | 1 |
Stone, Clement A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Kentucky | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Nebraska | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Utah | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Kentucky Education Reform Act… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
California Learning… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Yue Huang – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) is a cutting-edge technology-based intervention designed to help teachers meet their challenges in writing classrooms and improve students' writing proficiency. The fast development of AWE systems, along with the encouragement of technology use in the U.S. K-12 education system by the Common Core State Standards…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Writing Tests, Automation, Writing Evaluation
Olinghouse, Natalie G.; Zheng, Jinjie; Morlock, Larissa – Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2012
This study evaluated large-scale state writing assessments for the inclusion of motivational characteristics in the writing task and written prompt. We identified 6 motivational variables from the authentic activity literature: time allocation, audience specification, audience intimacy, definition of task, allowance for multiple perspectives, and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Writing Achievement, Audiences
Dappen, Leon; Isernhagen, Jody; Anderson, Sue – Assessing Writing, 2008
This paper is an examination of statewide district writing achievement gain data from the Nebraska Statewide Writing Assessment system and implications for statewide assessment writing models. The writing assessment program is used to gain compliance with the United States No Child Left Behind Law (NCLB), a federal effort to influence school…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Writing Achievement
Oregon State Dept. of Education, Office of Assessment and Evaluation, Salem. – 1998
This official scoring guide for writing presents details of the 6-point scoring system used in Oregon schools for the 1989-99 school year. It list attributes of students' responses to merit a score from 1 (lowest) to 6 (highest) in the areas of ideas/content, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, and citing sources. (RS)
Descriptors: Citations (References), Elementary Secondary Education, Language Usage, Scoring

Dudley, Martha – English Journal, 1997
Details the history of California's experience with large-scale writing assessment. Describes the introduction, development, and scoring of the California Assessment Program, later renamed the California Learning Assessment System (CLAS). Discusses controversies over removal of certain writing prompts and objections to CLAS. Notes that funding for…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Educational Assessment, Politics of Education, Program Descriptions
Parke, Carol S.; Lane, Suzanne; Stone, Clement A. – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2006
The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP) and the Maryland Learning Outcomes (MLOs) in a number of areas including teacher, principal, and student beliefs, classroom practices, and student learning in reading and writing. A statewide sample of 90 elementary and middle…
Descriptors: State Programs, Writing Evaluation, Reading Tests, High Stakes Tests
North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh. Div. of Accountability/Testing. – 1999
The purpose of this report is to provide information about the level of student performance in the area of writing based on results for 1998-99 from the annual on-demand writing sample of the North Carolina Writing Assessment at grades 4, 7, and 10 (English II). It notes student performance increased at grades 4 and 7 when compared to student…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Holistic Evaluation, Intermediate Grades, Secondary Education
Saylor, Kim; Overton, June – 1993
Teachers in Kentucky are using portfolios to determine strengths and weaknesses of individual students. Consequently, instruction is centered totally around the student. The implementation of portfolios sends the message to students that their first efforts should not be their last. Revision is part of improvement, and students are expected to…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Innovation, Educational Technology, Elementary Secondary Education

Vickers, Daisy – 1991
In 1982, writing was added to the North Carolina Annual Testing Program. Results from the 1990-91 writing evaluations in grades 6 and 8 are reported. Tests were read by two readers, with an agreement rate of over 71%. In 1990-91, sixth-grade students were asked to describe a kitchen so that readers could picture it. Quality was determined on the…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, English, Essay Tests, Grade 6