Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Logical Thinking | 2 |
| Mathematics Tests | 2 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 1 |
| Reaction Time | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 2 |
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkCaster, Timari T. – ProQuest LLC, 2018
The study endeavored to determine if teaching test-taking strategies had an impact on the students' performance on the ACT science subsection exam. Students received test-taking strategies instruction for the ACT science subsection exam. Students were administered a pre-and post-test, confidence survey, and strategies ranking list. The study also…
Descriptors: Test Wiseness, Science Achievement, Self Esteem, Algebra
Peer reviewedSemmes, Robert; Davison, Mark L.; Close, Catherine – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
If numerical reasoning items are administered under time limits, will two dimensions be required to account for the responses, a numerical ability dimension and a speed dimension? A total of 182 college students answered 74 numerical reasoning items. Every item was taken with and without time limits by half the students. Three psychometric models…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Logical Thinking, Timed Tests, College Students
