Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Test Theory | 1 |
Source
| Research in the Schools | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCoggins, Joanne V.; Kim, Jwa K.; Briggs, Laura C. – Research in the Schools, 2017
The Gates-MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test, fourth edition (GMRT-4) and the ACT Reading Tests (ACT-R) were administered to 423 high school students in order to explore the similarities and dissimilarities of data produced through classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analysis. Despite the many advantages of IRT…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Theory, Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests
