Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Replication (Evaluation) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| Raven Advanced Progressive… | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMulligan, Neil W.; Rawson, Katherine A.; Peterson, Daniel J.; Wissman, Kathryn T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Although memory retrieval often enhances subsequent memory, Peterson and Mulligan (2013) reported conditions under which retrieval produces poorer subsequent recall--the negative testing effect. The item-specific--relational account proposes that the effect occurs when retrieval disrupts interitem organizational processing relative to the restudy…
Descriptors: Testing, Recall (Psychology), Memory, Cognitive Ability
