Descriptor
Comparative Testing | 7 |
Aptitude Tests | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Occupational Tests | 4 |
Test Validity | 4 |
Adaptive Testing | 2 |
Adults | 2 |
Cognitive Tests | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
Individual Differences | 2 |
Mathematical Models | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Arima, James K. | 1 |
Christal, Raymond E. | 1 |
Cudeck, Robert | 1 |
Drasgow, Fritz | 1 |
Knapp, Deirdre J. | 1 |
Palmer, Pamla | 1 |
Pliske, Rebecca M. | 1 |
Vitola, Bart M. | 1 |
Wilbourn, James M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Armed Services Vocational… | 7 |
Armed Forces Qualification… | 2 |
General Aptitude Test Battery | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Cudeck, Robert – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1985
Twelve structural models of similarity were fitted to data from conventional and computer adaptive test (CAT) batteries measuring the same aptitude in a double cross-validation design. Three of the 12 models, including a multiplicative structure model, performed well, providing support for using CATs as replacements for conventional tests. (NSF)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Vitola, Bart M.; Wilbourn, James M. – 1971
Male and female enlistee samples were compared for total groups and by enlistment region in terms of their performance on the Airman Qualifying Examination (AQE) and the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). Women in the Air Force (WAF) test-retest performance was evaluated on the Armed Forces Women's Selection Test (AFWST) which is…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Military Air Facilities

Drasgow, Fritz; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
Extensions of unidimensional appropriateness indices are developed for multiunidimensional tests (multidimensional tests composed of unidimensional subtests). Simulated and real data (scores of 2,978 students on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) were used to evaluate the indices' effectiveness in determining individuals who are…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Computer Simulation, Equations (Mathematics), Graphs
Knapp, Deirdre J.; Pliske, Rebecca M. – 1986
A study was conducted to validate the Army's Computerized Adaptive Screening Test (CAST), using data from 2,240 applicants from 60 army recruiting stations across the nation. CAST is a computer-assisted adaptive test used to predict performance on the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT). AFQT scores are computed by adding four subtest scores of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Adults, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Testing
Palmer, Pamla; And Others – 1990
A statistical comparison was made of two test batteries, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB), using a sample of 406 subjects (98 civilian high school students and 308 military recruit examinees). The sample was predominantly white and male. A first analyses described the sample and…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Career Guidance, Comparative Testing, Correlation
Christal, Raymond E. – 1991
Two courses on logic gates were administered to 1,191 male and female recruits in Basic Military Training in 3 studies (448, 431, and 312 subjects, respectively) to evaluate the relative validities of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and the Learning Abilities Measurement Program (LAMP) tests in predicting individual…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Testing
Arima, James K. – 1979
Arima's Discrimination Learning Test (DLT) was reconfigured, made into a self-paced mode, and administered to potential recruits in order to determine if: (1) a previous study indicating a lack of difference in learning performance between white and nonwhites would hold up; and (2) the correlations between scores attained on the DLT and scores…
Descriptors: Armed Forces, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Testing