Descriptor
Source
International Journal of… | 2 |
Child Development | 1 |
Journal of the Division for… | 1 |
Mental Retardation and… | 1 |
Author
Rauh, Hellgard | 2 |
Diesch, Eugen | 1 |
Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O. | 1 |
Mayes, Susan Dickerson | 1 |
Pelco, Lynn E. | 1 |
Rudinger, Georg | 1 |
Sarpolis, Deborah L. | 1 |
Sexton, David | 1 |
Wasik, Barbara Hanna | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 3 |
Researchers | 3 |
Location
Australia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
West Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Bayley Scales of Infant… | 7 |
Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 2 |
Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 1 |
McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
Wechsler Preschool and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sexton, David; And Others – Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 1988
When administered to 34 infants with handicaps, Bayley Scale mental age scores were an average of 2.1 months higher than Estimated Developmental Ages (EDA's) calculated from the Uzgiris and Hunt Scales. The EDA's were significantly and positively related to Bayley mental age, and sensorimotor play emerged as the best single correlate. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Child Development, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Tests

Mayes, Susan Dickerson – International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1999
The Mayes Motor Free Compilation (MMFC) assesses mental ability in young (under age 2) children with motor disabilities. This study evaluated the concurrent validity of the MMFC by administering it and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development to normal children. Findings suggest that the MMFC provides a valid estimate of mental age, even without…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Concurrent Validity
Rauh, Hellgard; Diesch, Eugen – 1987
Two studies on cognitive performance in mentally retarded children are reported. In the first study, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development were administered to 56 mentally retarded children, aged 2 to 6, to determine the possibility of discerning subsets of items that form a developmental pattern of interrelated subscales, using the SCAMMO scale…
Descriptors: Child Development, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Style

Pelco, Lynn E.; Sarpolis, Deborah L. – International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1999
This study investigated the concurrent validity of the Mayes Motor Free Compilation (MMFC) using the mental scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) as the criterion variable with 50 typically developing preschool-aged children. Results indicated that the MMFC and the BSID scores were significantly and positively correlated.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Concurrent Validity
Rauh, Hellgard; Rudinger, Georg – 1987
Down Syndrome children (N=229), aged 1-83 months, from Australia, Canada, and Germany were tested using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Test performances on the Bayley's Mental and Motor scales were not dissimilar, leading to the conclusion that young Down Syndrome children from different countries with relatively comparable standards of…
Descriptors: Child Development, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Developed Nations
Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O. – Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2005
Preschool-age children who are experiencing delays in physical, cognitive, communication, social, emotional, or adaptive development are often referred for a comprehensive assessment to make diagnostic determinations and to help develop appropriate interventions. Typically cognitive assessment has a key role in a comprehensive evaluation of a…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals), Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Ability

Wasik, Barbara Hanna; And Others – Child Development, 1990
Children at risk for cognitive difficulties were put in two intervention groups, family and day care education and family education alone, and one control group. Children were tested for cognitive performance. The family and day care group scored higher than other groups. No intervention effects were observed for the family education alone group.…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Day Care