NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Juujarvi, Soile; Myyry, Liisa; Pesso, Kaija – Journal of Moral Education, 2010
The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between care and justice reasoning, dispositional empathy variables and meta-ethical thinking among 128 students from a university of applied sciences. The measures were Skoe's Ethic of Care Interview, the Defining Issues Test, Davis's Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Meta-Ethical…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Perspective Taking, Ethics, Empathy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Myyrya, Liisa; Juujarvi, Soile; Pesso, Kaija – Journal of Moral Education, 2010
The aim of this study was to clarify the relationships between empathy variables, personal values and moral reasoning. The impact of empathic concern, perspective taking and personal values measured by the Portrait Value Questionnaire on moral schemas measured by the Defining Issues Test was investigated among 599 students from a university of…
Descriptors: Interests, Perspective Taking, Norms, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rybash, John M.; And Others – International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1984
Administered standard and modified versions of the Defining Issues Test (DIT) to 40 older adults. Contrary to previous studies, the self/other manipulation failed to significantly influence older adults' moral judgments. The role of cognitive/perspective-taking and personal/affective factors in moral reasoning abilities are discussed. (JAC)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Aging (Individuals), Gerontology, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pressley, Michael; And Others – Child Development, 1980
College students who took the Defining Issues Test (DIT) were instructed to simulate the responses of 11-, 15-, and 19-year-old adolescents; other college students selected moral issues which they believed should be presented to adolescents in those age groups who were faced with the moral dilemmas in the DIT. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Age Differences, College Students, Ethical Instruction