Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Attitude Change | 2 |
Attitude Measures | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Moral Development | 2 |
Professional Education | 2 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
Gender Differences | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Humanism | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Draugalis, JoLaine R. | 1 |
Frye, Ann W. | 1 |
Glenn, Jason | 1 |
Lindon, James L. | 1 |
Riegle, Sandra E. | 1 |
Smith, Kirk L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Defining Issues Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Riegle, Sandra E.; Frye, Ann W.; Glenn, Jason; Smith, Kirk L. – Online Submission, 2012
Teachers tasked with developing moral character in future physicians face an array of pedagogic challenges, among them identifying tools to measure progress in instilling the requisite skill set. One validated instrument for assessing moral judgment is the Defining Issues Test (DIT-2). Based on the work of Lawrence Kohlberg, the test's main…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Medical Students, Physicians, Statistical Analysis

Lindon, James L.; Draugalis, JoLaine R. – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1992
This paper discusses a cross-sectional study that assessed the moral development profiles of undergraduate pharmacy students (n=71) using Rest's Defining Issues Test. Analysis showed no significant difference in mean level of principled moral reasoning between first and fourth professional year undergraduate students. (GLR)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitude Measures, Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis