Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Moral Development | 4 |
| Perspective Taking | 4 |
| Cognitive Development | 2 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Adolescent Development | 1 |
| Affective Behavior | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Anxiety | 1 |
| Caring | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Finland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 4 |
| Interpersonal Reactivity Index | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Juujarvi, Soile; Myyry, Liisa; Pesso, Kaija – Journal of Moral Education, 2010
The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between care and justice reasoning, dispositional empathy variables and meta-ethical thinking among 128 students from a university of applied sciences. The measures were Skoe's Ethic of Care Interview, the Defining Issues Test, Davis's Interpersonal Reactivity Index and Meta-Ethical…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Perspective Taking, Ethics, Empathy
Tjosvold, Dean; And Others – 1978
A group of 45 undergraduates discussed a moral issue with a confederate who had the same opinion (no-controversy) or opposite opinion (controversy). Subjects in the controversy conditions were induced to have a high level of defensiveness by a disconfirmation of personal competence or a low level of defensiveness by a confirmation. Subjects in…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Conflict
Peer reviewedPressley, Michael; And Others – Child Development, 1980
College students who took the Defining Issues Test (DIT) were instructed to simulate the responses of 11-, 15-, and 19-year-old adolescents; other college students selected moral issues which they believed should be presented to adolescents in those age groups who were faced with the moral dilemmas in the DIT. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Age Differences, College Students, Ethical Instruction
Peer reviewedTjosvold, Dean; Johnson, David W. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1978
Undergraduates discussed a moral issue with a confederate who had the same opinion (no controversy) or opposite opinion (controversy) within either a cooperative or a competitive context. Subjects in the controversy conditions indicated more conceptual conflict, engaged in more information seeking, and were more accurate in taking the cognitive…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Competition, Conflict Resolution, Cooperation

Direct link
