Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Natural Language Processing | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Readability | 2 |
Readability Formulas | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Computational Linguistics | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
McNamara, Danielle S. | 2 |
Balyan, Renu | 1 |
Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
Dascalu, Mihai | 1 |
Kyle, Kristopher | 1 |
McCarthy, Kathryn S. | 1 |
Skalicky, Stephen | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 2 |
Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Balyan, Renu; McCarthy, Kathryn S.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2018
While hierarchical machine learning approaches have been used to classify texts into different content areas, this approach has, to our knowledge, not been used in the automated assessment of text difficulty. This study compared the accuracy of four classification machine learning approaches (flat, one-vs-one, one-vs-all, and hierarchical) using…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Prediction
Crossley, Scott A.; Skalicky, Stephen; Dascalu, Mihai; McNamara, Danielle S.; Kyle, Kristopher – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
Research has identified a number of linguistic features that influence the reading comprehension of young readers; yet, less is known about whether and how these findings extend to adult readers. This study examines text comprehension, processing, and familiarity judgment provided by adult readers using a number of different approaches (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Readability, Adults