Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Connected Discourse | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Guides | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Reading Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Fusaro, Joseph A. | 1 |
| Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
| Louwerse, Max M. | 1 |
| McCarthy, Philip M. | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 2 |
| Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Fry Readability Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcNamara, Danielle S.; Louwerse, Max M.; McCarthy, Philip M.; Graesser, Arthur C. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
This study addresses the need in discourse psychology for computational techniques that analyze text on multiple levels of cohesion and text difficulty. Discourse psychologists often investigate phenomena related to discourse processing using lengthy texts containing multiple paragraphs, as opposed to single word and sentence stimuli.…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Connected Discourse, Difficulty Level, Rhetoric
Peer reviewedFusaro, Joseph A. – Reading Research and Instruction, 1988
Supports the results of a previous study that concluded that the Farr-Jenkins-Paterson formula resulted in a more difficult readability level than the Flesch Reading Ease formula, the Dale-Chall Readability formula, and the Fry Readability Graph, and that the Fry Readability Graph is accurate within one grade level. (MS)
Descriptors: Guides, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Research
