Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Alsree, Zubaida | 1 |
Aziz, Anealka | 1 |
Fook, Chan Yuen | 1 |
Kouame, Julien B. | 1 |
Longo, Judith A. | 1 |
Rush, R. Timothy | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Fry Readability Formula | 4 |
Dale Chall Readability Formula | 2 |
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 2 |
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
National Adult Literacy… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Aziz, Anealka; Fook, Chan Yuen; Alsree, Zubaida – Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2010
Reading materials are considered having high readability if readers are interested to read the materials, understand the content of the materials and able to read the materials fluently. In contrast, reading materials with low readability discourage readers from reading the materials, create difficulties for readers to understand the content of…
Descriptors: Readability, Computational Linguistics, Reading Materials, Second Language Learning
Kouame, Julien B. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2010
Background: Readability tests are indicators that measure how easy a document can be read and understood. Simple, but very often ignored, readability statistics cannot only provide information about the level of difficulty of the readability of particular documents but also can increase an evaluator's credibility. Purpose: The purpose of this…
Descriptors: Readability, Readability Formulas, Evaluation Methods, Literacy

Longo, Judith A. – Journal of Reading, 1982
Validates the college-level designation of the Fry Graph using comparative validity data. (AEA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Materials
Rush, R. Timothy – 1984
Noting that readability formulas are strictly text-based and therefore do not reflect the interactive nature of the reading process, this paper argues that many of the instructional material evaluations for which such formulas are used are inappropriate and offers more reader-based alternatives to the use of formulas. The first half of the paper…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Materials, Readability