Descriptor
Author
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Breland, Hunter M. | 1 |
| Bridgeman, Brent | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Fowles, Mary E. | 1 |
| Haberman, Shelby J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 3 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 3 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| Law School Admission Test | 1 |
| Medical College Admission Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textHaberman, Shelby J. – ETS Research Report Series, 2004
Statistical and measurement properties are examined for features used in essay assessment to determine the generalizability of the features across populations, prompts, and individuals. Data are employed from TOEFL® and GMAT® examinations and from writing for Criterion?.
Descriptors: Language Tests, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Business Administration Education
Breland, Hunter M.; Bridgeman, Brent; Fowles, Mary E. – College Entrance Examination Board, 1999
A comprehensive review was conducted of writing research literature and writing test program activities in a number of testing programs. The review was limited to writing assessments used for admission in higher education. Programs reviewed included ACT, Inc.'s ACT™ program, the California State Universities and Colleges (CSUC) testing program,…
Descriptors: Writing Research, Writing Tests, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis
