Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Test Use | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Mathematics Tests | 1 |
| Pilot Projects | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCarlson, Sybil B.; Ward, William C. – 1988
Issues concerning the cost and feasibility of using Formulating Hypotheses (FH) test item types for the Graduate Record Examinations have slowed research into their use. This project focused on two major issues that need to be addressed in considering FH items for operational use: the costs of scoring and the assignment of scores along a range of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Costs, Pilot Projects
Schaeffer, Gary A.; And Others – 1995
This report summarizes the results from two studies. The first assessed the comparability of scores derived from linear computer-based (CBT) and computer adaptive (CAT) versions of the three Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General Test measures. A verbal CAT was taken by 1,507, a quantitative CAT by 1,354, and an analytical CAT by 995…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Equated Scores
