Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Early Intervention | 2 |
| Reading Achievement | 2 |
| Reading Difficulties | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| High Risk Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Reading Psychology | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChapman, James W.; Tunmer, William E. – Reading Psychology, 2016
The recently reported i3 Scale-Up of Reading Recovery (May et al., 2015) found an effect size of +0.69 in favor of Reading Recovery compared to the control group. We discuss four issues: (a) many of the lowest achieving students were excluded from participation in Reading Recovery; (b) the control group received a range of different experiences;…
Descriptors: Reading Programs, Early Intervention, Reading Difficulties, Program Effectiveness
Download full textMounts, Josephine – 1996
A study examined the effectiveness of the Reading Recovery program. Subjects were 60 third-grade students (100% minority students) from the midwest who came from low and middle-to-low socioeconomic status. Half of the students received Reading Recovery in first grade, half did not. Comparison of Iowa Tests of Basic Skills scores indicated no…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Early Intervention, Grade 3, High Risk Students
