NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Sapp, Gary L.; And Others – 1985
The concurrent validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) was examined by comparing K-ABC scores and Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised (WISC-R) scores for 58 school children in primary and intermediate grades. Thirty-seven of these children had either educable mental retardation, learning disabilities, or…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Investigated validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with 89 preschool Head Start children from low-income families, using Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Form LM as criterion measure. Found some support for concurrent and construct validity of both instruments for use with…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Low Income Groups
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1987
The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children were administered in counterbalanced order followed by the Cognitive Domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory to a sample of 30 nonhandicapped, preschool children (13 males and 17 females). Correlations (corrected for restriction in range) among the three…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Whitworth, Randolph H.; Chrisman, Sabine M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) were administered to Anglo- and Mexican-American children aged four to six. Both scales measured similar, but not identical, intellectual and achievement factors, indicating concurrent validity. Anglo children scored higher on WPPSI verbal…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Early Childhood Education
Smith, Douglas K. – 1990
The consistency by which shared abilities are assessed on three intelligence tests was investigated. Instruments under consideration include: the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. A list of shared abilities and the subtests…
Descriptors: Ability, Child Development, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heath, Charles P.; Obrzut, John E. – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Examined relationship of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised), (WISC-R), and the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery (W-JPB), Part Two, using children (N=34) with learning disabilities. Found more consistent relationships between WISC-R and W-JPB Achievement tests than…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S.; McLean, James E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Investigated factor structures of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for 212 normal children. Findings suggest correspondence between: (1) WISC-R Verbal Comprehension and K-ABC Achievement; (2) WISC-R Perceptual Organization and K-ABC Simultaneous Processing; and (3) WISC-R…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Buse, Sylvia T.; McCall, Virgil W. – 1988
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were compared using a sample of 26 developmentally disabled children, aged 32 to 73 months. The focus of the study was to determine the feasibility of the K-ABC both for assessment and for planning more effective remediation programs for this…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1987
This study investigates the validity of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (S-B:4) for use with students with learning disabilities. It compares the performance of 18 elementary-age students on the S-B:4 and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). The subjects were identified by their school as having learning…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing
Lyon, Mark A.; Smith, Douglas K. – 1986
This study examined agreement rates between identified strengths and weaknesses in shared abilities and influences on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Sixty-seven students in the first through seventh grades referred for learning disabilities (LD) evaluation were…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Elementary Education