NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McGill, Ryan J. – Psychology in the Schools, 2020
The present study examined the factor structure of the Kaufman assessment battery for children-second edition normative update with normative sample participants aged 7-18 years (N = 500) using confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation and multidimensional scaling procedures. For the 10 subtest Cattell-Horn-Carroll core…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Children, Test Validity, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Potvin, Deborah C. H.; Keith, Timothy Z.; Caemmerer, Jacqueline M.; Trundt, Katherine M. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
With an age range from 3 to 13 years, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II) offers an appealing option for the assessment of cognitive abilities for children. Although independent research has provided evidence of the construct validity of the KABC-II for school-age children, previous studies have rarely included an…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Factor Structure, Preschool Children, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Swanson, H. Lee; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1989
The factor structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children was evaluated with 169 gifted students, aged 6-10. Results tentatively suggested that the factor solution for gifted students is dissimilar to that for the standardization sample, as subtests designed to assess sequential processing did not all load together, nor did those…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Factor Structure, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bain, Sherry K. – Journal of Special Education, 1993
Analysis of Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) Sequential and Simultaneous Processing scores of 94 children (ages 6-12) with learning disabilities produced factor patterns generally supportive of the traditional K-ABC Mental Processing structure with the exception of Spatial Memory. The sample exhibited relative processing strengths…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Construct Validity, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ochieng, Charles O. – International Journal of Testing, 2003
Conducted a meta-analysis of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) to ascertain the numbers of factors in the mental processing subtest of the K-ABC. Analyses yielded sequential and simultaneous processing factors, suggesting that the original K-ABC theory was not supported. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCallum, R. Steve; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1985
Gifted elementary students (N=54) completed the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Factor structures for mental processing and achievement subtests were compared to factor structures for children from the standardization sample, revealing similar structures. The most parsimonious structure, however, accounted for under 40 percent of shared…
Descriptors: Achievement, Children, Cognitive Processes, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S.; McLean, James E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Investigated factor structures of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for 212 normal children. Findings suggest correspondence between: (1) WISC-R Verbal Comprehension and K-ABC Achievement; (2) WISC-R Perceptual Organization and K-ABC Simultaneous Processing; and (3) WISC-R…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keith, Timothy Z. – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
K-ABC (Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children) scores for 585 school-age children referred for psychological evaluation were factor analyzed. While it appears that the K-ABC factor structure is quite consistent for both normal and exceptional children, the meaning and names of factors found are open to interpretation. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Exceptional Persons, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaufman, Alan S.; Kamphaus, Randy W. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
The construct validity of the Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing and Achievement scales of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children was supported by factor-analytic investigations of a representative national stratified sample of 2,000 children. Correlations provided insight into the relationship of sequential/simultaneous…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Valencia, Richard R.; Rankin, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
Factor analyses of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were performed on separate groups of Anglo (n=100) and Mexican-American (n=100) fifth-grade children to determine the comparability of underlying structures and to examine the existence of possible bias in construct validity of the K-ABC for each group. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kline, Rex B.; And Others – Assessment, 1994
The construct validity of a supplemental scoring system for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) was evaluated with 146 referred school-age children (aged 6 to 12.5 years) and the K-ABC normative sample. Results support the construct validity of only part of the scoring model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Construct Validity, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keith, Timothy Z. – School Psychology Review, 1985
Three levels from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) standardization sample were randomly selected and their subtest score intercorrelations were subjected to factor analysis. The analyses yielded minor inconsistencies which suggest the instrument does not primarily measure simultaneous and sequential processing and achievement as…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Correlation, Elementary Education